In recent years, rapid urbanisation has forced governments and city planners to reconsider how cities should be designed. While some people argue that living and working in a vertical city with numerous high-rise buildings is more beneficial, others believe that a horizontal city with fewer tall structures offers a better quality of life. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
On the one hand, supporters of vertical cities claim that this model is a practical solution to overpopulation and limited land availability. High-rise buildings allow a large number of people to live and work within a compact area, which helps to reduce urban sprawl. As a result, essential facilities such as offices, shopping centres, and public services can be located close to residential areas, saving time and increasing productivity. Moreover, vertical cities often encourage the use of public transportation, which can alleviate traffic congestion and lower carbon emissions. From an economic standpoint, concentrating businesses in tall buildings can also stimulate innovation and collaboration by bringing professionals closer together.
On the other hand, opponents argue that horizontal cities provide a healthier and more sustainable living environment. Cities with fewer tall buildings usually have more open spaces, parks, and low-density housing, which can significantly improve residents’ physical and mental well-being. Living in such environments reduces stress levels and promotes a stronger sense of community, as people are more likely to interact with their neighbours. In addition, horizontal cities are often associated with better air quality and less noise pollution. Critics of vertical cities also point out that high-rise living may lead to social isolation and overreliance on elevators and artificial environments.
In my opinion, although horizontal cities offer a more comfortable lifestyle, vertical cities are a more realistic and efficient solution for modern urban development. Given the continuous growth of the global population and the scarcity of land in major cities, building upwards is often unavoidable. However, this does not mean that vertical cities should ignore human well-being. By integrating green spaces, recreational areas, and sustainable design into tall buildings, cities can combine efficiency with livability.
In conclusion, both vertical and horizontal cities have distinct advantages and drawbacks. While horizontal cities prioritise comfort and community, vertical cities address the urgent challenges of population density and land limitation. Ultimately, a balanced approach that incorporates the strengths of both models is the most effective way to design future cities.
I am Jalolova Charos. I was born in Kashkadarya region of Uzbekistan. Now, I am studying at Uzbekistan State World Language University. My hobbies are reading books, playing table tennis and listening to music.