THE CONSTITUTION AS A GUARANTEE OF FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY

Jumayev Sanjar Ilyos ogli is a 3rd-year student of the Faculty of Law at the Karakalpak State University named after Berdaq
E-mail: sanjar2005j@outlook.com | Phone: +998 88 656 6005

Academic supervisor: Gulimov Amanlik Bazarbayevich, Doctor of Law, Professor at the Karakalpak State University named after Berdaq

Abstract

This article examines the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan as the supreme legal instrument guaranteeing individual freedom, human dignity, and long-term national prosperity. Relying on the 2023 constitutional reforms and contemporary theories of constitutionalism, the study analyzes how the principles of sovereignty, the rule of law, separation of powers, and political pluralism form a stable foundation for democratic governance. Special attention is given to the Constitution’s human-rights architecture, including the recognition of human dignity as the highest value, the direct applicability of constitutional norms, and the mechanisms ensuring judicial protection. Furthermore, the article explores the Constitution’s role in shaping a modern social state, safeguarding economic rights, reinforcing legal predictability, and promoting peaceful international engagement. The research concludes that the renewed Constitution of Uzbekistan functions not only as a legal framework but also as a strategic blueprint for ensuring freedom, justice, sustainable development, and the well-being of present and future generations.

Keywords: Constitution; constitutionalism; rule of law; human dignity; fundamental rights; sovereignty; separation of powers; democratic governance; social state; legal certainty; economic rights; Uzbekistan Constitution; international law; national prosperity.

Introduction

A constitution represents the supreme legal and political framework through which a state defines its fundamental principles, delineates the structure of public authority, and secures the rights and freedoms of its citizens. In modern constitutional theory, it operates as both a normative instrument of governance and a social contract reflecting the collective will of the people. As the embodiment of constitutionalism, a constitution limits state power, ensures the rule of law, and establishes mechanisms that safeguard individual autonomy against arbitrary interference.

Within this theoretical context, the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan occupies a central place in shaping the country’s democratic transformation. The 2023 constitutional reforms introduced a substantially modernized legal and institutional architecture designed to strengthen the protection of human rights, enhance governmental accountability, and promote the principles of social justice and sustainable development. By reaffirming human dignity as the highest constitutional value, expanding the catalogue of fundamental rights, and reinforcing guarantees of legality and judicial independence, the renewed Constitution reflects global constitutional standards while preserving the nation’s historical identity and statehood traditions.

The significance of the Constitution extends beyond its legal dimensions: it serves as a strategic blueprint for building an open, just, and prosperous society. As the foundational legal act with direct effect throughout the state’s territory, it establishes the principles of sovereignty, political pluralism, separation of powers, and civic participation—all of which contribute to long-term social stability and economic growth.

Accordingly, this article examines the Constitution of Uzbekistan as the primary guarantor of freedom and prosperity. It explores the theoretical foundations of constitutionalism, analyzes the constitutional mechanisms that protect fundamental rights, and assesses how the renewed Constitution provides an institutional environment conducive to human well-being, democratic governance, and national progress. The central argument advanced herein is that the modernized Constitution functions not merely as a legal document but as a comprehensive framework that secures liberty, justice, and sustainable prosperity for present and future generations.

Methods

This study employs a multidisciplinary legal research methodology that integrates doctrinal analysis, comparative constitutional review, and normative evaluation to examine the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan as a guarantor of freedom and prosperity. The methodological approach is structured around four primary components.

First, a doctrinal (black-letter law) analysis is conducted to interpret the constitutional provisions directly relevant to sovereignty (Article 1), popular legitimacy (Article 7), fundamental rights (Articles 13–35), the rule of law and supremacy of the Constitution (Article 15), separation of powers (Article 11), and political pluralism (Article 12). This analysis allows for a precise understanding of the normative functions, internal coherence, and legal effects of constitutional norms within the national legal system. The text of the Constitution (2023 edition), as published on the official legal portal Lex.uz, serves as the primary source.

Second, the research applies a comparative constitutional methodology to situate Uzbekistan’s constitutional reforms within the broader global context. This includes examining relevant standards contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), and selected comparative models from civil law and post-Soviet constitutional systems. This method enables the identification of structural similarities, divergences, and harmonization trends between Uzbekistan’s constitutional framework and internationally recognized norms of constitutionalism.

Third, the study uses a normative-evaluative method to assess the extent to which constitutional principles contribute to the realization of freedom, justice, and socio-economic well-being. Particular attention is given to the Constitution’s provisions on the protection of human dignity (Article 13), guarantees of judicial protection (Articles 26–28), and recognition of international law supremacy in relevant contexts (Article 15). These elements are evaluated in light of established theories of constitutionalism, rule of law, and the social state.

Fourth, a systemic-structural analysis is applied to examine how constitutional institutions operate as interdependent components of democratic governance. This includes an assessment of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, mechanisms of constitutional review, and instruments ensuring civic participation such as referenda (Article 9). The systemic approach also considers the preamble’s emphasis on intergenerational responsibility and sustainable development as a structural objective of constitutional governance.

By synthesizing these methodologies, the research provides a comprehensive assessment of the Constitution as both a supreme legal act and an instrument for ensuring long-term national development. This methodological framework allows for an integrated and scientifically grounded understanding of how constitutional norms operate in practice and how they contribute to the establishment of an open, just, and prosperous society in Uzbekistan.

Results

The research demonstrates that the renewed Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan provides a comprehensive legal framework that effectively secures fundamental freedoms, reinforces institutional accountability, and promotes long-term national prosperity. The results are reflected across four major constitutional dimensions.

1. Strengthening Sovereignty and Popular Legitimacy. The findings show that the Constitution firmly establishes Uzbekistan as a sovereign, democratic, social, and secular state (Article 1), thereby consolidating the state’s legal and political independence. Popular sovereignty is articulated through the principle that “the people are the sole source of state power” (Article 7), which aligns with international democratic standards, including Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The prohibition of unauthorized assumption of state power—declared unconstitutional in Article 7—further strengthens political stability and institutional legitimacy.

2. Expansion and Constitutionalization of Fundamental Rights. The analysis confirms a significant expansion of human rights protections, consistent with global human rights instruments such as the ICCPR and ICESCR. Human dignity, declared the “highest constitutional value” (Article 13), serves as the normative foundation for all rights and freedoms. Key protections include:

• the right to life and inviolability of the person (Articles 24–25);
• guarantees of fair trial, presumption of innocence, and protection from arbitrary detention (Article 26), consistent with Articles 9 and 14 of the ICCPR;
• inviolability of private life, personal data, and home (Articles 27–28);
• strengthened social, economic, and environmental rights, including labor protections, property guarantees, and environmental safety (Articles 40–50).

Moreover, the Constitution’s direct effect clause (Article 15) ensures that these rights are judicially enforceable without the need for implementing legislation, significantly enhancing access to justice.

3. Reinforcement of the Rule of Law and Institutional Checks and Balances. The results highlight the entrenchment of the rule of law as a constitutional cornerstone. Article 15 establishes constitutional supremacy, while Article 16 prohibits any interpretation or regulation that undermines fundamental constitutional principles. The tripartite separation of powers (Article 11) is further reinforced by:

• increased parliamentary oversight over the executive;
• enhanced guarantees of judicial independence;
• the introduction of more explicit mechanisms for constitutional review.

These developments correspond to Venice Commission standards on constitutional justice and strengthen legal predictability, transparency, and governmental accountability.

4. The Constitution as a Framework for Socio-Economic Prosperity. The renewed Constitution embeds the characteristics of a modern social state by codifying guarantees related to social welfare, entrepreneurship, private property, and sustainable development. The preamble articulates the responsibility to preserve natural resources for “present and future generations,” while environmental protection is constitutionally mandated in Article 50. Economic rights—including the freedom of enterprise, protection of private property, and state obligations to foster a favorable investment environment—align with global economic-governance principles reflected in OECD and UN development frameworks.

Furthermore, the integration of international law into the domestic legal order (Article 15) enhances Uzbekistan’s global economic engagement and strengthens investor confidence, contributing to long-term national prosperity.

Discussion

The findings of this research demonstrate that the renewed Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan represents a substantial advancement in the normative foundations of constitutionalism, aligning the country with contemporary global standards of democracy, human rights protection, and sustainable governance. The constitutional reforms are not merely formal amendments; rather, they embody a structural transformation of the legal and institutional order, strengthening both individual freedoms and the state’s capacity to ensure long-term socio-economic development.

1. The Constitution as a Modern Social Contract. The entrenchment of popular sovereignty in Article 7 positions the Constitution as a genuine social contract reflecting the will of the people—an element that resonates with classical constitutional theory from Rousseau to modern democratic governance models. Unlike earlier constitutional frameworks in the region, Uzbekistan’s renewed Constitution provides stronger safeguards to prevent the usurpation of state power, ensuring political legitimacy and stability. This contributes to a governance environment where the rule of law prevails over administrative discretion.

2. Human Dignity and Rights Protection in a Global Context. The explicit recognition of human dignity as “the highest constitutional value” (Article 13) marks a doctrinal shift that brings Uzbekistan in line with the constitutional traditions of Germany, Italy, South Africa, and other states where dignity serves as an interpretive cornerstone. This approach not only strengthens domestic rights protections but also harmonizes with international human rights instruments, particularly the UDHR and ICCPR.

By constitutionalizing a broad spectrum of civil, political, economic, social, and environmental rights, Uzbekistan moves toward a holistic model of constitutional welfare. The direct effect of constitutional norms (Article 15) is particularly significant, as it transforms rights from declarative provisions into enforceable legal entitlements. This positions Uzbekistan alongside jurisdictions such as Spain and Brazil, where constitutional rights enjoy immediate judicial enforceability.

3. Strengthening the Rule of Law and Institutional Accountability. The consolidation of the separation of powers (Article 11) and constitutional supremacy (Article 15) demonstrates a commitment to a stable, predictable legal order. These elements are essential for preventing executive overreach and ensuring the accountability of all branches of government. From a comparative perspective, these developments mirror recommendations of the Venice Commission and the best practices of consolidated democracies. Enhanced judicial independence and expanded possibilities for constitutional review further deepen the rule of law environment, which remains foundational for both human rights protection and socio-economic progress.

4. The Constitution as an Engine of National Prosperity. The renewed Constitution embraces the concept of the social state through provisions guaranteeing social welfare, environmental stewardship, and economic freedom. This multidimensional approach reflects global constitutional trends, where prosperity is understood not solely in economic terms but also in relation to sustainable development, social equity, and intergenerational justice. The explicit constitutional commitment to preserving natural resources for “present and future generations” reflects principles found in the constitutions of Norway, Ecuador, and other environmentally conscious states.

Moreover, the recognition of international treaties as having precedence over conflicting legislation (Article 15) strengthens Uzbekistan’s integration into the global legal system. This fosters legal certainty for investors, facilitates international cooperation, and aligns national legislation with global standards—factors that are crucial for economic modernization and long-term prosperity.

5. Implications for Constitutional Development. The results indicate that Uzbekistan’s constitutional model is evolving toward a hybrid system combining elements of classical liberal constitutionalism, social-state principles, and international legal integration. This positions Uzbekistan uniquely within the post-Soviet legal landscape, signaling a deliberate shift toward global democratic norms while preserving national identity and sovereignty.

Conclusion

The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan stands as the central legal and moral pillar safeguarding human dignity, political freedom, and sustainable national development. The findings of this research confirm that the renewed constitutional text—strengthened through the 2023 reforms—establishes a comprehensive framework aligned with both classical constitutional doctrines and contemporary international standards, including those articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

By elevating human dignity to the status of the highest constitutional value, guaranteeing the direct effect of constitutional norms (Article 15), and reinforcing the separation of powers (Articles 11–13), the Constitution ensures legal predictability, transparency, and accountability as fundamental governing principles. Moreover, the consolidation of socio-economic rights, the affirmation of the social state model, and the deepening of commitments to lawful international cooperation collectively demonstrate that constitutionalism in Uzbekistan functions not merely as a system of restraints, but as a proactive architecture for societal progress.

Ultimately, the Constitution operates as both a legal guarantor and a long-term strategic blueprint for an open, just, and prosperous society. Its normative strength, institutional coherence, and rights-based philosophy render it a durable foundation for national development and a vital safeguard for the freedoms and well-being of present and future generations.

REFERENCES

1. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-6445145
2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/
3. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1966). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/
4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). United Nations. https://www.un.org/
5. Venice Commission. (2016). Rule of Law Checklist. Council of Europe.
6. Venice Commission. (2010). Report on Constitutional Principles. Council of Europe.
7. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
8. Tushnet, M. (2015). Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
9. Waldron, J. (2012). The Rule of Law and the Measure of Property. Cambridge University Press.
10. Shapiro, M., & Stone Sweet, A. (2002). On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford University Press.
11. Feldman, D. (2012). Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales. Oxford University Press.
12. Raz, J. (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
13. Grimm, D. (2016). Constitutionalism: Past, Present, and Future. Oxford University Press.