Sevinch Rustamova Shukhrat qizi was born on October 13, 2005, Kashkadarya region, Uzbekistan. She is currently a third-year student of the Faculty of Medicine (Med-01U group) at Kimyo International University in Tashkent.
She has participated in several international Olympiads and has a strong interest in poetry and literature. Her poems and creative works have been published in international anthologies in Egypt and Qatar.
In addition, in 2025 she took part in an International Anthology in Turkey, where she presented her creative works and delivered a speech on an international platform.
Furthermore, her scientific articles and theses have been published in a number of high-level academic journals. She also actively participates in national conferences and scientific forums, contributing to academic and literary discussions.
The article discusses three types of understanding music, taking into account its existence on two levels: cosmic and actual. It is noted that the first type of understanding is offered by the West, the second by the East, and the third by Russia.
It is argued that according to the Western interpretation music is, in the ultimate sense, is non-sounding (silence), according to the Eastern interpretation, it is the sound of nature and according to the Russian interpretation, it is prayer.
In conclusion, it is stated that these three interpretations of music represent three possible paths to understanding its essence.
Keywords: music, understanding of music, West, East, Russia.
Preamble
For a long time, music has been perceived by people on two levels: the intelligible – cosmic, and the real – actual. But what is music that exists on these two levels, and what is it? We believe that there are three approaches to understanding music. The first is offered by the West, the second by the East, and the third by Russia. Let’s explore them.
West
In the West, in the perception of music, its cosmic level dominates over the real, actual, i.e. the cosmic predetermines the existence of the real musical sound. This understanding was formed in Ancient Greece, in the teachings of Pythagoras (6th century BC) about the sounding cosmos – the harmony of the spheres (Greek: ἁρμονία ἐν κόσμῳ).
According to Pythagoras, who passed this knowledge on to his Pythagorean students, the cosmos is a sound, and this sound is caused by the rapid movement of the planets. Each rapidly moving planet produces a specific sound. The relationship between these sounds (in terms of their pitch) is mathematically precise, corresponding to the distances between the planets that produce them. According to the Neoplatonic philosopher Iamblichus (3rd – 4th century) in his famous book “On the Life of Pythagoras” (“The Life of Pythagoras”), Pythagoras believed that the planets “emit a song… rich and full-sounding (due to their movement)… and this movement is composed of their different and diverse noises, speeds, sizes, and constellations, which are arranged in a certain… proportion” [12, p. 52].
Pythagoras believed that this pattern was the basis of music. According to Iamblichus, Pythagoras came to this conclusion after passing by a blacksmith’s shop. “As he was walking by, he heard the sound of iron being forged on an anvil, and the simultaneous strikes of the hammers produced a very harmonious sound. He discerned in them… consonances… Rejoicing (at his discovery. – A.K.), he ran into the forge and, by trial and error, discovered that the sound depended on the weight of the hammer, rather than on the force of the blow, the shape of the hammer, or the position of the iron being forged” [12, p. 78] (1).
Pythagoras’s idea of the dominance of cosmic music over real, actual music is further developed by Boethius (5th – 6th centuries).
In his treatise “The Elements of Music”, Boethius establishes that cosmic music, which he refers to as mundane, predetermines the existence of real music, which he calls instrumentalis. Boethius writes, “the music called mundane is most evident in the phenomena observed in the sky itself, in the unity of the [four] elements, and in the diversity of the seasons. And how is it possible for such a fast-moving heaven to move silently?” [2, p. 11]. “The order in music is inseparable from this celestial rotation” [2, p. 13] (2).
Further, the idea under consideration was developed by Regino of Prüm (9th – 10th centuries). In his treatise “On the Study of Harmony”, Regino refers to cosmic and actual music as natural and artificial, respectively, and writes that natural music “is not produced by any musical instrument, any touch of the fingers, blow, or stroke, but (is inspired by. – A.K.) by divine command” [34, p. 190], while artificial music “is invented… by the human mind and… is performed through the use of instruments”. “The power of natural music cannot be known except through artificial music” [34, p. 193].
The idea of the influence of cosmic music on actual music continued to develop in the West in the 15th and 16th centuries.
In the 15th century, this idea was developed by Adam of Fulda. In his work “On Music”, based on the ideas of Regino of Prüm, Adam notes that cosmic, or world, music belongs to the natural realm, while actual, or instrumental, music belongs to the artificial realm. He states, “there are two types of music: natural and artificial. Natural music is the sound of celestial bodies, arising from the movement of the spheres, where there is believed to be the most harmony. This kind of music is handled by mathematicians… artificial music is handled by musicians”. At the same time, as Adam believed, and this was his innovation, artificial music is divided into instrumental and vocal [34, p. 359].
In the 16th century, this topic was addressed by Josephfo Zarlino. In the first part of his work “The Establishment of Harmony”, he writes: “The extent to which music was glorified and revered as sacred is clearly evidenced by the writings of philosophers and especially Pythagoreans, since they believed that the world was created according to musical laws …”. The Pythagoreans established that “the movement of (celestial bodies. – A.K.) is the reason (why. – A.K.) our soul … awakens from songs and sounds, and they … have a life-giving effect on its properties” [1, p. 603].
The idea of the influence of cosmic music on real, actual music became more prominent in the West in the 17th century. Johann Kepler played a significant role in its development.
In Kepler’s reflections on this topic in Book V of his treatise “Harmony of the World”, there is a crucial point. Kepler argues that the cosmos governs music, and he supports this claim by suggesting that planets have human-like voices. He states: “Saturn and Jupiter in the sky have, in some way, the properties that nature has given, and custom has attributed to the bass, and we find the properties of the tenor on Mars, the properties of the alto on Earth and Venus, and the same properties as the treble on Mercury, if not in the equality of intervals, then certainly in proportionality…” [35, p. 185] (3).
The peculiar evolution of Western scientists’ ideas about the primacy of cosmic music over actual music continued further. So, in the 19th century, it received a response from I. Ritter.
I. Ritter, in one of the notes of the collection, entitled “Fragments from the legacy of a young physicist”, notes that the planets “are in very harmonious relations with each other”, and we can say that. that “whole rhythmic-periodic systems, ‘whole concerts’… are resolved… at a higher level (merging. – A.K.) into one – a higher – tone”. According to Ritter, this is observed in human-created music, where “each of our tones is a system of tones” [31, p. 337].
The topic under consideration continues to develop in the West in the 20th and 21st centuries. This development takes place in two directions.
The first direction, which originates from philosophical judgments, can be found in the works of R. Steiner, A. von Lange, M. Talbot and others. Thus, in his book “The Essence of Music and the Experience of Tone in Man” (“Das Wesen des Musikalischen und das Tonerlebnis im Menschen”), R. Steiner expresses the idea that there are “ideal forces (whose constructive activity is the music of the spheres) that lie behind the material world”. They “operate in a way that is most fully embodied in music” [39, pp. 46-47] (4).
The second approach is based on the achievements of science. Its main representatives are J. Godwin and J. James. For example, J. Godwin writes that in our time, when “physicists have questioned the assumptions of their predecessors” (such as the interchangeability of mass and energy, time and space, and the influence of the subject on objective experimentation), “it is only natural that ‘speculative music’ should be revived” [8, p. 374]. And then there’s the “revelation”: Godwin argues that we need to understand “music as a cosmos” [8, p. 373].
So, according to the Western model, the harmony of the spheres predetermines the existence of our real, actual music. But what’s interesting is that the harmony of the spheres is not audible, it is speculative (or, more precisely, it is heard). This is how the later Pythagoreans described it: “We do not hear this sound… the reason for this is that this sound is present immediately upon birth, so that it is not distinguishable from the opposite [silence]. For the distinction between sound and silence is relative [and depends on their relationship] to each other. Thus, just as it seems to the coppersmiths, due to habit, that there is no difference [between silence and knocking when they work], so the same thing happens to [all] people [when perceiving the harmony of the spheres]” [23, pp. 357-358]. From this we can conclude that in the Western dimension, music is ultimately non-sounding, silent (let us recall the famous “summary” of the development of music in the West – 4’33” by John Cage) (5).
East
In the East, in the understanding of music, its actual, physical, level dominates over the cosmic. This position was established in all the states of the Ancient East and was embodied in the doctrine of sound.
Most clearly, this doctrine manifested itself in Ancient India in the concept of two types of sounds: manifested – physical (Ahata Nada) and unmanifested – cosmic (Anahata Nada) [9; 10].
According to the ancient Indians, the physical sound (Ahata Nada) leads to the cosmic sound (Anahata Nada). This is confirmed by the interpretation of the sound (syllable) Om / Aum (Sanskrit: ॐ) (6).
Om is a mysterious and sacred sound. When a person speaks Om, it merges with the sound of the universe [44, p. 77]. Om is constantly mentioned in the Upanishads, and its mysterious purpose is revealed in the Mandukya Upanishad. This sacred text says:
“[Om] Aum! This sound is all of it. Here is its explanation:
The past, the present, and the future are all the sound [Om] Aum.
And the other things beyond the three times are also the sound [Om] Aum” [27, p. 201] (7).
The creative power of Om is especially evident when it is pronounced not only as a separate sound, but also as an element that connects ritual actions that occur over time (8).
At a certain stage of historical development, the interpretation of a specific musical composition called raga (Sanskrit: राग) emerged as a vivid embodiment of the realization of the movement of music from its actual (physical) level to the cosmic level in India. It was believed that raga reaches a universal scale due to the sounds that form it, known as swaras (Sanskrit: स्वर).
Given the importance of the swaras, it is not surprising that a large number of theoretical works have been devoted to their discussion in India.
The most authoritative of these is the treatise “The Composition on the Music of Different Localities” (“Brihaddeshi”) by Matangi (7th century).
In this treatise, Matanga writes about swara as follows:
“This word (swara) is derived from the root ‘rājr’
(meaning ‘to shine’) and the prefix ‘swa’ (meaning ‘self’).
Thus, we refer to swara as something that shines on its own” [33, p. 120].
The scale of a raga consists of seven swaras: Sa (shadja [ṣaḍja]), Ri (rishabha), Ga (gadhara), Ma (madhyama) Pa (panchama), Dha (dhayvata) and Ni (nishada). The most important of these is the first: Sa (shadja) (9).
Fundamentally, in India, swara was not only the sound of a raga, but the sound in general. Here, for example, is what he writes in his treatise “The Nectar of Music” (“Sangitamakaranda”) Narada (8th century):
“[It is known that] the peacock cries in the shadja swara,
the chataka in the rishabha,
the goat makes the gadhara swara,
the curlew manhyama
and the cuckoo at the time of flowering
cuckoos in the swara panchama,
the horse neighs in the dhayvata
and the elephant trumpets in the swara nishada” [33, p. 107].
It is obvious that swara is the way to the cosmic sound: the sound of the world. This is confirmed by Indian scholars. Thus, the sage Bharata (1st century BC) in his treatise “The Composition on the Beauty of Music” (“Gitalankara”) notes: “[swaras] embrace the whole world” [33, p. 92]. In his work “Musical Grammar” (the original title of the work is unknown), Irayanar (4th century) writes: “In the space of the world and the worlds… there is (only) sound; it constructs the entire space of the universe…” [33, p. 101]. Finally, Sharnagadeva (13th century) states in his work “The Ocean of Music” (“Sangitaratnakara”): “The world is built on sound” [33, p. 118].
This interpretation of sound / swara has become stable and has survived to the present day [37; 41].
But what is this somewhat abstract concept of the sound world? Of course, it is the sound of nature.
Thus, based on this explanation, we can say that in India, music is essentially the sound of nature (10). Since the Indian interpretation of music is the quintessence of the Eastern attitude to music in general, we can say that in the East, music is essentially the sound of nature [42; 43] (11).
Russia
In Russia, in the interpretation of music, its levels: cosmic and actual merge. There is no dominant, they are one. And such an understanding is associated with angel-like singing.
Angel-like singing is the singing in the Orthodox church of parishioners together with angels, who by their singing constantly glorify God (12). In Russia, such singing was formed by the 15th century. It was znamennoe chant (Church Slavonic: znamꙗ) (13).
The most significant expression of angel-likesinging is the Cherubic chant.
The Cherubic chant is a chant that is sung during the Liturgy. It serves as a preparation for the faithful to the Great Entrance.
In the Russian Church, this chant was established after the 15th century. Initially, it was a one-voice (monodic) chant characterized by a slow unfolding of extended melodic lines and a free, asymmetrical rhythm.
Since the 16th century, the Cherubic chant has been performed in three voices (three lines). It was recorded in lines, hence the name “line chant”.
The three-voice Cherubic chant is comparable to the polyphony that occurs when Russian lyrical long songs are performed. The combination of three voices created unique harmonic combinations similar to those found in Russian folk polyphony. The Cherubic chants of the 15th and 16th centuries were usually unattributed.
In the 17th century, an important event took place: the znamennoe chant was replaced by the partes chant (Latin: partes). Partes is a Western polyphonic chant that was introduced to Russia through Poland. As a result of this introduction, the znamennoe chants of the Cherubim in Russia acquired Western major-minor harmonization. The Cherubim also gained authorship. In the 17th century, V.P. Titov was a well-known composer of the Cherubim.
A special feature of the Cherubim Titovs was that the voices in them did not reunite or “befriend”, but rather represented, as N.P. Diletsky put it, “a struggle of voice with voice” [5, p. 66].
In the 18th century, when writing the Cherubic chants, they tried to bring the Western harmonization closer to the ancient chant. D.S. Bortnyansky achieved the greatest success in this regard. This was especially evident in his most famous Cherubic chant – Cherubic chant No 7. However, even in this chant, the Western style prevailed, proving that Bortnyansky was indeed “aligned with the Italian school of sacred music” [29].
It should be noted that as a result of the partes chant that was established in Russia in the 17th and 18th centuries, the Cherubim that were created for the church turned out to be concert compositions rather than works that should be performed during worship [4]. Angel-like singing disappeared from them (14).
The decisive change in the composition of the Cherubim belongs to M.I. Glinka. This change can be described as a “turn to the origins”.
Glinka conceived the composition of the Cherubim (which is the only one in his oeuvre) in an effort to revive the original sacred music in the church. According to the composer’s own admission, “[he] wanted to test his abilities in sacred music; he wrote the Cherubim…” [7, p. 77] (15).
In Cherubim, Glinka managed to recreate the image of liturgical singing as a language of communion with God. Angel-like singing “came to life” in it [22, p. 15].
Glinka’s Cherubic chant became the starting point for the composition of Cherubic chants by Russian composers of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including P.I. Tchaikovsky, N.A. Rimsky-Korsakov, S.V. Rakhmaninov, A.D. Kastalsky, A.T. Grechaninov, P.G. Chesnokov, V.S. Kalinnikov and many others (16).
Perhaps the most openly followed Glinka A.D. Kastalsky. His Cherubim (first of all the Cherubim of the znamennoe chant) Kastalsky, focusing on Glinka, sought to transform “into something musically sublime, strong in its expressiveness and close to the Russian heart” [14, p. 60].
Castalsky’s Cherubim became the true “Castalian Key” for Russian composers in the 20th and 21st centuries to write similar compositions: Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeev), Archimandrite Nafanail (Bachkalo), Archimandrite Matthew, Fr. Sergius Trubachev, A.A. Tretyakov and others.
They found an exceptionally vivid manifestation in the Cherubim of Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeev) (one of which was even written on the theme of J.S. Bach!).
The achievement of the Metropolitan’s Cherubim was the expression of the unfathomable depths of the spirit. It is significant that, when commenting on the figurative structure of the Cherubim (its archetypal appearance), the composer cites a passage from the description of the mysterious vision of the prophet Ezekiel:
“‘The Cherubim stood on the right side of the house… and a cloud filled the inner court… And the noise of the wings of the Cherubim was heard even in the outer court, as the voice of God Almighty when He speaks. And the Cherubim had the appearance of hands under their wings. And I saw four wheels near the Cherubim, one wheel near each Cherubim, and the wheels looked like they were made of topaz stone. And all four looked similar, as if a wheel were inside a wheel. When they walked, they walked in four directions; they did not turn around during their march, but they went in the direction of their heads. And all their bodies, and their backs, and their arms, and their wings, and their wheels, were full of eyes…’ (Ezekiel 10:3, 5, 8-12)” [11, pp. 425-426] (17).
Thus, Glinka’s Cherubic chant became the seed (“acorn”) of the development of Cherubim in Russia. It is important to emphasize that this development, in general, was expressed in the filling of Cherubim with angelic-like singing.
Indeed, the angelic-like singing in the Cherubim became more sublime and beautiful and finally reached its full power [24; 25] (18). This moment marked the birth of Russian music (19).
But what is Russian music, which has absorbed the angelic-like singing? It is a prayer. With this in mind, we can confidently say that in Russia, music, in its true form, is a prayer (20).
Conclusion
So, there are three models of music: Western, Eastern, and Russian. This means that there are three ways to understand the fundamental principles of music (I think the reader can guess which way the author of this article prefers). These paths are different. Is it possible for them to intersect? I believe it is possible, because these are the three paths of One Human Being, a Resident of the Earth…
Literature
Aesthetics of the Renaissance. Anthology: In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, 1981.
Boetius A.M.S. Fundamentals of Music: Transl. from Latin. 2nd ed., revis. and expand. Moscow, 2019.
Danilov Yu.A. Johann Kepler and his “Harmony of the World”. In: Patterns of Symmetry: Collection of Materials: Transl. from English. M., 1980.
Denisova I.V. Are Concert and Prayer Compatible? Church Singing Culture of the 18th and 19th centuries. In: Church Word. Minsk, 2001. No 8 (http://sppsobor.by/word/all-issues/2985).
Diletsky N.P. The Idea of Musical Grammar. Moscow, 1979.
Gardner I.A. The Liturgical Singing of the Russian Orthodox Church. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, 2004.
Glinka M.I. Notes. M., 1988.
Godwin J. The Revival of Speculative Music. In: The Musical Quarterly. 1982. Vоl. 68. No 3.
Guy L. Beck. Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition. Columbia, 2012.
Guy L. Beck. Sonic Theology: Hinduism and Sacred Sound. Columbia, 1993 (Delhi, 1995).
Hilarion (Alfeev), Metr. Liturgy. Historical and Theological Commentary on the Liturgies of John Chrysostom and Basil the Great. Moscow, 2019.
Iamblichus. On the Life of Pythagoras: Transl. from the Greek. Moscow, 2002.
Ignatius (Brianchaninov), St. The Christian Shepherd and the Christian Artist. In: Theological Works. Moscow, 1996. No 32.
Kastalsky A.D. On My Musical Career and My Thoughts on Church Music. In: Russian Sacred Music in Documents and Materials. Vol. V. Moscow, 2006.
Khan H.I. The Mysticism of Sound [Collection]. Moscow, 1997.
Kivy P. Music Alone: Philosophical Reflections on Purely Musical Experience. Ithaca, 1990.
Klujev A.S. Russian Philosophers on Music. In: Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. 2022. Vol. 23. Issue 2.
Kuzmin V.I., Galusha N.A. Pythagoras’s Harmony of the Spheres. Unified Rhythms of Nature. Moscow, 2001.
Kuzmin V.I., Galusha N.A. Pythagoras’s Harmony of the Spheres. A Quantitative Reconstruction Option. In: System Research. Yearbook 2000. Moscow, 2002.
Lange A. von. Mensch, Musik und Kosmos. Anregungen zu einer goetheanistischen Tonlehre. Bd I. Freiburg i. Br., 1956.
Levando P.P. Glinka’s “Cherubic chant”. In: Russian Choral Culture. History. Traditions. Modern Problems: Collection of Scientific Papers. St. Petersburg, 1995.
Losev A.F. Ancient Musical Aesthetics. In: Losev A.F. Music as a Subject of Logic. Ancient Musical Aesthetics. Moscow, 2023.
Lossky N.V., Priest. An Essay on the Theology of Liturgical Music. An Orthodox Perspective: Translated from French. Moscow, 2021.
Lossky V.N. Theological Foundations of Church Singing. In: Martynov V.I. History of Divine Service Singing. Moscow, 1994.
Lysenko V.G. The Om Slog in Indian Culture: From Oral Tradition to Writing. In: Proceedings of the Russian Anthropological School. Moscow, 2012. Vol. 10.
Mandukya Upanishad. In: Upanishads. In 3 books: Book 2: Transl. from Sanskrit. Moscow, 1992.
Medushevsky V.V. Spiritual Analysis of Music: In 2 parts. Moscow, 2016.
Metallov V.M., Priest. An Essay on the History of Orthodox Church Singing in Russia. 4th ed., revis. and expand. Moscow, 1915.
Morozova T.E. Raga in Hindustani Music. The Modern Period. M., 2003.
Musical aesthetics of 19th century Germany. Anthology: In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1981.
Musical aesthetics of Russia of the 11th – 18th centuries. Moscow, 1973.
Musical aesthetics of the East. Moscow, 1967.
Musical aesthetics of the Western European Middle Ages and Renaissance. Moscow, 1966.
Musical aesthetics of Western Europe of the 17th – 18th centuries. Moscow, 1971.
Rachinsky S.A. Folk art and rural school. In: Russian sacred music in documents and materials. Vol. III. Moscow, 2002.
Rowell L. Music and Musical Thought in Early India. Chicago, 2015.
Sementsov V.S. Problems of interpretation of Brahmanic prose. Ritual Symbolism. Moscow, 1981.
Steiner R. Das Wesen des Musikalischen und das Tonerlebnis im Menschen. Dornach, 1975.
Syrkin A.Ya. Some Problems of the Study of the Upanishads. Moscow, 1971.
Te Nijenhuis E. Indian Music: History and Structure. Leiden, 1974.
Vasilchenko E.V. Musical Cultures of the World. The Culture of Sound in Traditional Eastern Civilizations. Moscow, 2001.
Vasilchenko E.V. Sound in the System of World Civilizations’ Culture. Moscow, 2013.
Werner K. A Popular Dictionary of Hinduism. Surrey, 1997.
(1) This idea of Pythagoras has been substantiated in modern scientific research [19; 20].
(2) Boethius speaks about the existence of another level of music – the human one, caused by the mixing of the “disembodied liveliness of the mind with the body”. He calls this level humana. However, the humana level is associated with the mundane level. This was also noted in the Pythagorean school [12, pp. 51-56].
(3) For more information on Kepler’s interpretation of the connection between cosmic music and real music, see, for example: [3].
(4) A. von Lange’s statement is also expressive in its own way: “The entire spiritual organism of man, in which the depth of musical experience rests unconsciously, is formed from the cosmos through the harmony of the spheres” [21, p. 364].
(5) The philosophical justification of this position can be found in the works of P. Kivi. In particular, Kivi argues in one of his works that music is “devoid of semantics” and is a “quasi-syntactic structure” with no fixed meaning. He suggests that it is the inaudible aspects of music, such as its title or program, which are often not transformed into sound, that give it its significance [16]. The work has received a large number of laudatory reviews (https://philpapers.org/rec/KIVMAP).
(6) Om and Aum are one. The accents (matras) A, U, and M express the states of consciousness: A is awake, U is with sleep and dreams, and M is with deep sleep without dreams [26].
(7) See also: [40].
(8) “In every initial action… there is a ‘very first’ beginning; this beginning… is Om: this [sound] syllable begins (and ends) every chant, in fact, not only every chant, but also, apparently, every formula, hymn, etc… By means of a special pronunciation of this syllable, the ritual action was given the much-needed quality of ‘continuity’… Thus, all the pauses in the ritual could be filled with the syllable Om, and not only within the given rite, but also between one rite and the next, which could, in principle, take place at any time – in 2-3 hours, in 2 weeks, in a year…” That is, the sound of Om “was understood as something eternal” [38, p. 121].
(9) Its significance is emphasized by the fact that it is played by the tambura (a musical instrument used in the performance of a raga) throughout the entire raga. This significance is due to the fact that, according to the Indians, this sound is Om. In other words, Om is the core of raga. Here is how T.E. Morozova writes about this: “The sacred Om, as an inexhaustible source (akṣara), was a symbolic key element in the development of Indian… music. It became the prototype of the ‘ever-sounding’ fundamental… tone… the strongest ‘point of attraction’… the ‘sound epicenter’… in the rāgās” [30, p. 59].
(10) This statement is confirmed by H.I. Khan. “When we pay attention to [the sounds of] nature”, Khan notes, “we find that every thing on earth contributes (to these sounds. – A.K.). Trees joyfully wave their branches in rhythm with the wind; the sound of the sea, the murmur of the breeze, the whistling of the wind in the rocks, among the hills and mountains… a thunderclap… [And] insects have their concerts… and bird choirs sing their hymns of praise in unison.… Indian music is based on the principle of raga, which makes it similar to nature (because. – A.K.) ragas (are part of. – A.K.) nature songs (italics are mine. – A.K.)” [15, pp. 100, 102].
(11) As E.V. Vasilchenko notes, in the East “music itself is something secondary to sound” [43, p. 11].
(12) The first mentions of angel-likesinging in Russia are found in Metropolitan Hilarion’s “The Word of Law and Grace” (11 century), in Kirill Turovsky’s “The Word” (12 century), later in Joseph Volotsky’s “Enlightener” of the 15th – 16th centuries and others.
(13) The basis of Russian chanting is the Russian folk song. We can say that Russian chanting was born from the Russian folk song [18, p. 63].
(14) Believers were deeply affected by his loss. There are many testimonies to this. Here is one. In the “Report on a Trip to Smolensk to See Metropolitan Simeon for ‘Great Spiritual Affairs’” by Ignatius, Archimandrite of the Novospassky Monastery, and Karion Istomin, a printer, poet, and educator, it is stated: “And the bishop said: … ‘And which verses are added in the liturgy before the Cherubic Hymn, and after the kynonik, and they are sung for the sake of wasting time, because the verses are short, and after singing they stand idle, and people are bored standing without singing’” [32, p. 160].
(15) The composer’s desire to create works for the church was inspired by his conversations with St. Ignatius (Brianchaninov). The article “The Christian shepherd and the Christian-artist” [13] became a kind of monument to the communication between two great people.
(16) The liturgical music of these composers has been called the “New Direction of Russian Sacred Music”. The term was proposed by S.A. Rachinsky in his article “Folk Art and Rural School”, which dealt with the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom by P.I. Tchaikovsky (1878) [36, p. 357].
(17) Do these images of Ezekiel not evoke the mystery of the Russian spiritual poem “The Dove/Deep Book” (15th – 16th centuries)?
(18) Not everyone was pleased with this. I.A. Gardner expressed his negative opinion about this trend [6, p. 495].
(19) Yes, Russian music was born in the church. And, most likely, in the works of composers of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, who received the appropriate impetus from Mikhail Glinka. At the same time, it should be noted that since Glinka’s time, composers who wrote music for the church have incorporated the vibrations and breath of this music into their secular compositions. This was done by Glinka, Musorgsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov… Here, for example, is what V.V. Medushevsky writes about S.V. Rakhmaninov’s “Vocalise”: “In the tender lament of repentant love… The vocalise… (on. – A.K.) the melodies’ descents are answered by ascents, and in the coda, the broken lament is illuminated by a counterpoint that leads to the heavenly world, according to the promise (cf. Matthew 11:28)… Here… is the essential beginning of the music of the Orthodox civilization… The Heaven accompanies the soul, and the soul listens to the encouragement of the Heaven…” [28, pp. 352-353].(20) This is the understanding of music that Russian thinkers and philosophers, starting with Nil Sorsky to N.O. Lossky, I.I. Lapshin, E.N. Trubetskoy, P.A. Florensky and others, have expressed in their works. See the article: [17]. Translated by: Klujev A. Russian philosophers about music: 1) Proceedings of the International Science Conference “Science. Education. Practice” (May 5, 2023). Delhi, 2023, pp. 40-46; 2) [El.] Ethicsacademy.co.in. 2023. 24.07; 3) [El.] Homo Universalis. 2025. 25.04; 4) [El.] Sindh Courier. 2025. 27.04; 5) [El.] Polis Magazino. 2025. 14.05.
I’m not a musician, not musical in any meaningful sense. I couldn’t carry a tune in a bucket, as they say. I’ve been accused of being tone deaf, which is not true, strictly defined. I hear tones perfectly well; I just can’t reproduce what I hear. When I do attempt to sing, what comes out of my mouth bears only a coincidental relationship with the sound I tell myself I’m trying to make. Moreover, I have no sense of rhythm. None. I can’t even take a pencil and tap along with the rhythm of a song I’m listening to. Hence, in addition to not being able to sing, I can’t dance, don’t ask me.
Considering my complete and utter musical ineptitude, what makes me think I’m qualified to, or even have a right to, attempt an essay on music? But this brings us to the very heart of the matter. No one needs to be convinced of the importance of music in the life of Beethoven or Billy Joel. But the place of music in our lives—all of us, man- and womankind—might be seen by implication in examining its importance, its pervasiveness, in the life of one startlingly unmusical fellow: me.
I have a feeling that music was born in the shhhhh of a mother attempting to comfort a fussy child. The shhhh begins in imitation of a soothing breeze, perhaps, but then develops a rhythm: SHH sh sh SHH sh sh SHH sh sh SHH. Add to the vocalization a gentle bouncing of the baby in its mother’s arms. Then maybe the mother rises and sways to the rhythm of the bouncing, the rhythm of the shhs. The swaying becomes a rhythmic step or two. Thus, dance is born with music and is forever inextricable.
The first song, then, was a cave woman’s lullaby but comes just as naturally to the twenty-first-century mother. I doubt, in fact, that it’s changed much. So too, my first song was a lullaby, and my first dance in my mother’s arms.
I don’t remember that song or dance, but I can clearly hear a ditty my father sang when I was two or three, I suppose. I couldn’t have been much older than that because it occurred during a game when I would sit on my father’s closed knees holding on to his thumbs as if they were the reins of a horse. “YIP yip yip yip YIP yip yip yip YIP yip yip yip,” he would sing out, then suddenly on a YIP would throw open his knees, and I’d plunge floorward, holding on to those thumbs for dear life. But was that truly music? Indeed it was. Music is for soothing, music is for sleeping, music is for fun. It’s not something merely accompanying or appended to a life experience; it’s part of our life experience from the very beginning of our awareness of life. Indeed, it predates memory.
I suppose the first formal song that I do remember is “Jesus Loves Me.” I can hear myself singing it loudly, happily:
Jesus Loves me, this I know,
For the Bible tells me so.
Little ones to Him belong.
They are weak but He is strong.
Baptists in little Missouri prairie towns like my Appleton City were brought up in a world of music. Our religion helped define who we were, and music helped define our religion. I’d argue, in fact, that Baptists are closer to God while singing hymns than while listening to a sermon or reading the Good Book. I haven’t been in a Baptist church in forty years, but even today if by chance I happen to hear a few bars from one of the old hymns in some movie or television program, I’ll be galvanized by powerful emotions, and I’ll break into song, much to my Catholic wife’s amusement or (more likely) annoyance.
Music-memories from my early years are rare and random, but then any memories from my early years are rare, hazy, and random. I remember sitting on our kitchen floor, playing, as my mother cooked or cleaned somewhere above me while listening to Eddy Arnold on the radio. I’ve never been a country music fan—except for Eddy Arnold. Eddy and I go back a long way.
One of my very few memories of actually performing music publicly occurred when I was in the first grade. It must have been during one of those interminable evenings for adoring relatives where each grade sings a song or two. Our song was “Mammy’s Little Baby Loves Short’nin’ Bread.” I don’t remember actually singing the song, but I do recall crouching down and staring through the barred back of a chair (perhaps supposed to be a bedstead?) and then suddenly crossing my eyes and making a face at the audience. Everyone laughed and applauded. How could they possible not have? I was so cute! That was it, though: my one brush with musical-comedy stardom.
My one other, even more vivid music-memory from my early childhood is decidedly darker. I’m not sure when or why I became shy, but I battled shyness into my adult years. Among its many manifestations was an abhorrence of being the center of attention. Cue the birthday party. A half-dozen little friends, plus probably a half-dozen little friends’ moms, all staring at birthday boy: me. Then they all begin to sing, “Happy Birthday.” I flee the room, crying, and cannot be lured back to hear “Happy Birthday” sung to me for another twenty years.
*
Somehow, sometime, early childhood became simply childhood with the music-memories more plentiful and vivid.
Not all of them do I welcome. I recall, with a little amusement but even more anger, standing nose to nose with my grade school music teacher as she tries to force me to reach a higher note than I’m capable of. “Higher!” she demands, stabbing me in the tender well between clavicle and trapezius with her pointy index finger. “Higher!” (stab) “Higher!” (stab) “Higher!” (stab).
At about the same time, I decided that being in the grade school band might be fun. Lured by its glittering, many-valved beauty, I chose the e-flat alto sax. Mistake. As it turns out, to make music one must open and close those valves in a certain order, each for a certain duration, while expelling oxygen into the horn, oxygen that, in my opinion, was better diverted into one’s own lungs. I hated playing the damn thing. I refused to practice. After three years, I could, if requested by our band director, Mr. Cummins, solo on either “Old McDonald Had a Farm” or “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star.” After a time or two, Mr. Cummins made no such requests. In reference to young Dennis, he just looked away.
Most of my music-memories from those years, however, are warm and glowing, even if those were not necessarily the emotions evoked at the time. I would, for instance, along with the rest of my family watch Your Hit Parade on our black and white RCA TV, accompanied by snow-static and a wonky vertical hold. Today, I think what a charming Norman Rockwell scene it was, nestled amongst my parents and siblings. Back then, though, I writhed in rage and disgust as some execrable pablum like “How Much Is That Doggie in the Window” was proclaimed #1 while the rock ‘n roll I was just beginning to discover was completely ignored in the rankings. (Speaking of rock ‘n roll, did you hear that Elvis was arrested for unzipping and zipping his fly onstage to the tune of “Hound Dog?”—as I overheard my father say to my mother, who frowned as only a Baptist can frown.)
Eventually, of course, rock ‘n roll won out.
Ironically, it was relatively late coming to that new, utterly dominating medium: television. Your Hit Parade ignored it, and most of the many variety shows then so popular rarely acknowledged rock’s existence. Still, young people had their ways of finding it. For me, rock ‘n roll meant the jukebox-of-many-shifting-colors in the Blue Inn, the one café in my tiny hometown. One play for a nickel or six for a quarter. Better-equipped cafés and diners had miniature jukebox-like apparatuses right on the tables, and you could make your choice nickel in one hand and cheeseburger in the other.
Cheeseburgers and curly fries; malts so thick they’d flatten a paper straw in two sucks; cherry Cokes; poodle skirts and pony tails; ducks-ass haircuts and black leather jackets—these were the teenage culture, and at the heart of that culture was rock ‘n roll.
By then we’d moved to the big city of Sedalia where my sister and her friends danced the stroll in our basement. I wasn’t allowed near them, but I listened and today can still sing “The Stroll” and could stroll across the floor if it weren’t for my bursitis.
Powerful and pervasive as rock ‘n roll was, it wasn’t the entirety of my music-world. My mother still dragged me to church Sundays, and I still enjoyed the hymns if nothing else. My father was superintendent of a small rural school district, and I’d ride along to basketball games on the team bus and sing “A Hundred Bottles of Beer on the Wall” until those bottles dwindled to zero. I still had music class in grade school and still couldn’t sing a lick, but I did enjoy learning to dance the waltz, minuet, and square dance—or do I only enjoy the memory of those dances?
Rock ‘n roll, though, was the straw that stirred the teenage drink.
I may not have made it to the basement for “The Stroll,” but Bill Killion and I taught each other to dance the twist, the mashed potatoes, and other rock ‘n roll iterations in my living room just in case we ever worked up the courage to ask a girl to dance.
Our models were the mythically cool kids on American Bandstand. For a time, Sedalia had its own version of American Bandstand on the local TV station, and Bill and I would watch seething with envy and self-loathing as some of our braver and vastly cooler classmates appeared right before our eyes on live television.
Then came high school, and to American Bandstand was added Hootenanny and, especially cool, Shindig. One night we had a hootenanny of our very own in our high school gymnasium, and, for a reason that escaped me even then, we all just had to buy a new pair of white Keds to wear. The hootenanny, alas, was hardly a hoot. We weren’t allowed to wear our new Keds onto the gym floor but instead shoved them up against the wall. My back ached and my butt hurt from sitting cross-legged on the hardwood. We were chastised by the folk group “entertaining” us for singing along sans invitation.
Although TV was indeed making inroads into the world of rock music, radio still ruled. On weekend nights we listened to it cruising the drag in our daddies’ cars (one of my friends even had a car of his own!), and we listened to it on clock radios in our bedrooms and on the new little transistor radios that were beginning to invade the market.
Sedalia had two radio stations, but KSIS played country music, so it didn’t count, and KDRO, our rock station, went off the air every day promptly at sundown. That left the nights when, really needing our rock fix, we’d turn that knob with the concentration of a safe cracker, trying to bring forth KCMO in Kansas City, WLS in Chicago, and, best of all, KAAY in Little Rock, Arkansas. (Many years later, fresh out of grad school, I moved with my family to Little Rock to teach at the University of Arkansas. I was devastated to find that KAAY had changed to a country music format.)
My most vivid rock-memory from those days won’t surprise anyone who was a teen then: that cold February night, 1964, when the Beatles appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show. As it happened, that weekend we’d been visiting my sister Kay in Chicago. Could we possibly make it back home in time for the Beatles? I remember sitting in the back seat willing the car forward with a burning intensity that perhaps helps account for my chronic stomach problems today. Did we make it in time? Yes. It’s a scene built for anticlimax, right? Wrong. I was hooked. After the program was over I ran down to our local supermarket and bought the first of many Beatles albums. I still have every single one.
*
Not all my music-memories from my teenage years involve rock ‘n roll.
No rock song hits me with the emotional force of one song we sang as we marched through the halls of Smith-Cotton High School the first day of the new school year, 1963.
We are the seniors, seniors are we!
We’ll never lose our [something or other].
We stick together, in all kinds of weather.
We are the senior class!
We were so young, and so many who marched with me, sang with me, are gone now. It was so long ago. It was yesterday.
An event more important even than the Beatles invasion—important at least to me and my musical experience—occurred at about the same time. I suppose I was just bored one day, scanning through our three TV channels to find something, anything, to occupy a half-hour, and there he was: Leonard Bernstein. And there were all those young people, about my age, being taught and cajoled and sometimes chastised, and I was instantly one of them, enthralled.
Nothing in my life experience could have led one to predict that I’d fall head over heels in love with classical music. I still listened to more rock ‘n roll, but that was because rock ‘n roll was all around me, instantly accessible on my dad’s car radio, my Toshiba transistor radio, and occasionally on television. Classical music, in the early 1960s in Sedalia, Missouri, was nowhere except for Bernstein’s Young People’s Concerts.
I did have a phonograph, though, and I began to spend more money on classical LPs than on rock 45s and albums. It wasn’t easy to do. Where to find them? Sedalia did have one tiny record store. When I went in one day and asked where I’d find the classical albums, the owner seemed perplexed. Then he caught on. “Oh, you mean sacred music.” He did have a small stash of “sacred” albums. Over the years, I bought most of them. I also joined the Columbia Record Club, raiding them for eight albums for the price of one (or whatever the entry offer was), then letting my membership lapse, then, a few years later when the coast was clear, joining again.
Alone in my room at night, I listened to the Beatles and Mary Wells, I listened to Beethoven and Mendelssohn. Just me and my fifty-dollar phonograph. There were times when it was almost enough.
*
My first, joyously hopeful days of college arrived to the tune of “Do Wah Diddy Diddy.” Something was coming down the street for me, Manfred Mann promised, a new mode of living in which I’d be not just a shy observer of life but a by God participant with a diddy-bopping girl on my arm.
It didn’t happen. My father died, and I commuted to college while living at home and working nearly forty hours a week on top of a full load of course work. Certainly I would have continued to listen to music, but, other than “Do Wah Diddy Diddy,” there’s not a single song that evokes my undergraduate years. They were bleak years, almost a half-decade without, in effect, music.
Well, technically, music did return, with more powerful emotional effect than ever, in my last semester of college. I don’t consider it “college music,” though, because something far more important than British Lit surveys was coming down the street for me, and it wasn’t singing “Do Wah Diddy Diddy.” It was Vietnam. It was the draft.
I swear that until that semester I’d hardly paid attention to what was going on over there, half a world away. While my friends were plotting ways to fail their draft physicals, or trying to get into the National Guard, or as a last resort keeping their precious selves clear of the rice paddies by going into the Navy or Air Force, I wasn’t worried at all. Hadn’t I always been lucky? Indeed, weren’t peace talks starting in Paris, just in time to save lucky me? But then the bastards spent weeks arguing over the shape of the freaking table! And two little words suddenly occurred to me: uh oh.
At the same time, music returned to me. “The Age of Aquarius.” “Eve of Destruction.” “For what It’s Worth.” On and on they came, evoking emotions I’d never imagined were the province of music: foreboding, fear, anger, indignation, defiance. Many of my generation listening to that same music, stung by those same emotions, hit the streets in protest or occupied classrooms and administration buildings or just said the hell with it and fled to Canada or Sweden. What did I do? In short, I got drafted.
On each of my last three nights as a civilian before riding the train to the induction station in Kansas City, I went to our local movie theater and watched Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet. Assuming my role as an English Professor Emeritus, I could point to significant parallels between Shakespeare’s Verona and that ghastly world I was about to enter, where teenagers shed their blood in conflicts created by their elders. But I assure you that nothing could have been farther from my thoughts at the time. For me, Romeo and Juliet was an oasis where I could distance myself from what was almost upon me, and at the heart of that oasis was the movie’s love theme: “A Time for Us.” Two months later, lying on the sunbaked dirt of the firing range at Ft. Leonard Wood, I tried to beguile into silence the reports of the M-14s to my right and left, and the M-14 in my hands, by conjuring up the lovely strains of that love theme.
“A Time for Us” couldn’t stand up to more powerful songs in basic training, though. “I Left My Home” and its many (frequently obscene) variations had been a marching staple for generations, of course, but Vietnam added its own special songs.
I’m going down to Cam Rahn Bay,
Gonna kill me a Charlie Cong today.
And, to the tune of the Coasters’ “Poison Ivy,”
Vietnan, Vietnam,
Nights while you’re sleepin’
Charlie Cong comes a creepin’ around, around.
Once out of basic training, rock ‘n roll reasserted itself on the jukeboxes in the bars that we frequented and on the boomboxes in the barracks we called home. West Point where I was an MP briefly, revisits me whenever I hear Janis Joplin’s “Take Another Little Piece of My Heart.” Fishbach, Germany, where I later spent my days and often nights in a security tower guarding pine trees, bequeathed me any number of time- and place-specific songs. The Beatles “Long and Winding Road” somehow captured the sense of dislocation I felt: how far from home, how long it’d be before I’d see it again. Led Zeppelin, though, Led Zeppelin! I’d first encountered Led Zep at West Point, but Robert Plant’s strident wailings and Jimmy Page’s other-worldly riffs seemed incongruous in the barracks-full of MP elite, law students from Georgetown, pre-meds from Johns Hopkins, rich men’s sons from Syracuse and Amhurst. But in that shabby MP barracks snuggled into the Black Forest of southwest Germany, we were not elite but juicers (me), hash-heads, and acid freaks. I wasn’t a doper, but I had good friends among them. Those dopers were gentle folk, and they loved their Led Zep, and so, eventually, did I. LedZep III reigned then. “The Immigrant Song” captured dislocation as ably as “The Long and Winding Road,” except instead of the Beatles’ syrupy wistfulness, it hit with a cold shudder. And “Hangman” offered a violence as cruel and irrational as that transpiring across the globe in Vietnam.
My last memory of Germany before boarding the airliner for home was packing up the treasure-trove of rock albums I’d purchased in the PX. Need I say I still have them?
*
When I returned to the States, a different world awaited me. In fact, a different me awaited me. I was more experienced, more mature, less shy.
Also awaiting me, although it would take some weeks for our paths to cross, was a tall blond young woman from Queens, New York. To be more precise, our paths did not cross so much as merge. They’re still together, a single path, to this day.
We met and began dating at the University of Missouri to the strains of Carol King’s Tapestry. Our passion flared to the pulsing rhythms of Iron Butterfly’s In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. All one semester we and a group of similarly cash-strapped friends would end our Saturday nights drinking cheap beer and watching Star Trek reruns, and even today hearing the opening bars of the Star Trek theme song stirs me with a vision of adventure and hope.
Saturday afternoons were for football.
Fight, Tiger fight for old Mizzou!
Right behind you everyone is with you!
we sang; and fifty years later, when I opened a birthday present from my son and found a Missouri Tigers ballcap, I stood and sang again, “Fight, Tiger fight for old Mizzou!” and it all came back as surely as the past came back with Proust’s petit madeleine.
*
We were married when I was just entering the PhD program at Mizzou, and three years later I became a father, and everything changed. Including music.
I could still sing “Fight Tiger” but rarely felt the urge to. I still listened to rock ‘n roll, but it was all oldies now, something resurrected from my past. I didn’t know the new groups, the new hits; didn’t care. I still listened to classical, but it was background music now to more important, more vital things.
Indeed, over the following decades, the two great genres that had been so important to me, rock and classical—and even adding a third, jazz, which I’d come to appreciate—became curiously “fixed,” no longer dynamic but dusty props in the stage setting of my life.
This means that music was no longer important to me? Hardly. Rock, classical, and jazz might have been less vital, but there was once again “A Time for Us” from Romeo and Juliet, which my wife and I danced to at our wedding (“Come on, Dennis. Use the other step,” Dr. Saltpeter smirked as I lumbered past), a more powerful memory than anything from The Stones or Led Zep. And no rock song from my youth could make the tears stand in my eyes as they do now recalling my baby girl in her onesie, “dancing” in my hands before the full-length mirror as I sang a song of my own invention:
Christine, Christine,
She’s so pristine,
Always drinks Ovaltine!
My baby girl who is a year away from fifty.
Six years later at a Brownie father-daughter dance, she left her brand-new Mary Janes among a row of identical Mary Janes against the gymnasium wall (just as thirteen years earlier I’d left my brand-new Keds up against the gym wall at our disappointing hootenanny), and then we danced, her tiny white-stockinged feet atop my size 13s. I don’t remember what specific songs we danced to, but I remember dancing with my little girl. Fifty, almost fifty now.
My son bequeathed me a Beatles song to deposit in my memory bank, that vault of emotions. It was the song his senior class chose to have played at their high school graduation. Afterward, the Class of 2000 went out into the world. You try to raise them so that they can leave you. We raised Matthew well; he left us to the tune of “In My Life.”
They played Pachelbel’s “Canon in D Major” at Matthew and Carolyn’s wedding, accompanied by thunder and lightning and four inches of rain before the reception was over. Their marriage, though, has been one of storm-free blue skies—unless you count the occasional full-throated explosion from a baby boy, teething or otherwise enraged. Three baby boys, in fact, Andrew, William, and James.
William, when babysitting Grandma and Grandpa put him down for his nap, would hear of no lullaby other than the one his mother sang: “You Are My Sunshine.” I’m sure Andrew and James had their special songs, too, but they kept that secret between themselves and their mother. I could make all three of them laugh until the tears came, though, with my PG-rated variations on the public library song:
The place to go when you need to pee,
Is your local public li-brar-y.
Andrew, entering his teenage years and too old for toys but too young to want clothes, is hard to shop for for birthdays and Christmas. What music does he like? Even if we knew, how does one buy music these days? No 45s, no albums, no 8-tracks, no cassettes, even CDs almost a thing of the past. Kids listen on their cellphones, I take it, but how does that music get there? No, don’t bother explaining to me. I really don’t care. This world is not my world, its music not my music.
I don’t have the energy or the interest to attempt to keep up with newer music. Is rap really music? If it is, it’s not for me. I wouldn’t know a Taylor Swift song if I tripped over one. I’m hopeless on Jeopardy when a pop music category comes up. Do they still compose classical music? Couldn’t prove it by me. Of course, there’s contemporary jazz, but I can’t be bothered with it. The old stuff, that’s my music. Decades, centuries old. Old, old music for an old, old man.
Can you name one song written for an old man? Well, there is Chopin’s “Funeral March.” The funereal and the elegiac, that’s what we old men are left with.
I used to think half-seriously of compiling a playlist as background music for those hardy few who’ll gather, in lieu of a formal funeral, in some tavern party-room to toast my passing. No longer. I don’t care what music they play; I don’t care if they play music at all. I won’t be there to hear it, will I?
Now, I ponder more than half-seriously what music will be the last I’ll hear as I lay dying, in the very last moments of my life. For I would like some music to accompany, if not drown out, the death rattle.
If I could choose, I’ve thought of Bach’s The Goldbery Variations, my favorite of all classical pieces. I’ve thought of Davis’s Kind of Blue, drifting on out with Miles and Coltraine and Cannonball and those other divinely cool cats. I’ve thought of my favorite hymn, “Amazing Grace,” which always brings me comfort even in my most agnostic moods. I think of “St. Louis Blues,” which I hereby declare to be my favorite song of all time. I’d go strutting on out with Bessie Smirth, Satchmo on the trumpet.
But probably I won’t get to choose. I’ll hear whatever my weary, frightened self conjures up for me. I bet it will be a lullaby, the one my mother sang to her baby boy, in need of comfort. I don’t remember what song she sang, but I know that she sang to me, and I’m sure that when the time comes, I’ll say, Oh yes, that song.
Then, the silence.
Dennis Vannatta is a Pushcart and Porter Prize winner, with essays and stories published in many magazines and anthologies, including River Styx, Chariton Review, Boulevard, and Antioch Review. His sixth collection of stories, The Only World You Get¸ was published by Et Alia Press.
COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS OF STATISTICAL DATA: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES
Associate Professor Nargizaxon Olimova
Department of Management
Andijan State Technical Institute
Second-year student of Marketing
Andijan State Technical Institute
Sardorjon Ahmadjon o‘g‘li Ergashev
Annotasiya: Ushbu maqolada statistik ma’lumotlarni yig’ish va tahlil qilishning zamonaviy usullari atroflicha ko’rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqotning asosiy maqsadi turli sohalarda ma’lumotlarni to’plash, qayta ishlash va ulardan ilmiy-amaliy xulosalar chiqarish bo’yicha tizimli yondashuvlarni taqdim etishdan iborat. Ma’lumotlarni yig’ishning an’anaviy va innovatsion usullari, jumladan, so’rovnomalar, kuzatuvlar, eksperimentlar va raqamli manbalardan foydalanish tahlil qilinadi. Shuningdek, ma’lumotlarni tozalash, birlashtirish va dastlabki tahlil qilish bosqichlari muhimligi ta’kidlanadi. Maqolada statistik tahlilning asosiy vositalari, jumladan, deskriptiv statistika, korrelyatsion va regressiya tahlili, gipotezalarni tekshirish usullari va ma’lumotlarni vizualizatsiya qilishning ahamiyati yoritilgan. Zamonaviy dasturiy ta’minotlar va texnologiyalarning statistik tahlildagi roli ham muhokama qilinadi. Tadqiqot natijalari turli ilmiy yo’nalishlar va amaliy sohalarda samarali Kalit so’zlar: statistik ma’lumotlar, ma’lumotlarni yig’ish, ma’lumotlarni tahlil qilish, deskriptiv statistika, regressiya tahlili, gipoteza tekshirish
Annotation: This article comprehensively examines modern methods of collecting and analyzing statistical data. The main purpose of the study is to present systematic approaches to collecting, processing, and drawing scientific and practical conclusions from data in various fields. Traditional and innovative methods of data collection are analyzed, including surveys, observations, experiments, and the use of digital sources. In addition, the importance of data cleaning, integration, and preliminary analysis stages is emphasized. The article highlights the main tools of statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analysis, hypothesis testing methods, and the importance of data visualization. The role of modern software and technologies in statistical analysis is also discussed. The results of the research can be effectively applied in various scientific fields and practical areas.
Keywords: statistical data, data collection, data analysis, descriptive statistics, regression analysis, hypothesis testing.
Аннотация: В данной статье всесторонне рассматриваются современные методы сбора и анализа статистических данных. Основной целью исследования является представление системных подходов к сбору, обработке и получению научно-практических выводов на основе данных в различных областях. Анализируются традиционные и инновационные методы сбора данных, включая опросы, наблюдения, эксперименты и использование цифровых источников. Также подчеркивается важность этапов очистки данных, их объединения и первичного анализа. В статье освещаются основные инструменты статистического анализа, включая описательную статистику, корреляционный и регрессионный анализ, методы проверки гипотез, а также значение визуализации данных. Кроме того, рассматривается роль современных программных средств и технологий в статистическом анализе. Результаты исследования могут эффективно применяться в различных научных направлениях и практических сферах.
Ключевые слова: статистические данные, сбор данных, анализ данных, описательная статистика, регрессионный анализ, проверка гипотез.
Introduction Statistical data play an important role today in many fields such as scientific research, economics, social sciences, medicine, and technology. Decision-making based on data is considered the key to success in the modern world. The proper collection and analysis of statistical data ensures the objectivity and reliability of research. However, the complexity of data collection and analysis methods, as well as their incorrect application, may lead to inaccurate conclusions. Therefore, it is important to study these processes in depth and identify the most effective methods.
The main purpose of this research is to comprehensively examine the theoretical foundations and practical methods of collecting and analyzing statistical data. In particular, the study focuses on different methods of data collection, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the main statistical tools and modern software solutions used in data analysis. The relevance of the study lies in the fact that with the increasing volume of data and expanding opportunities for their use, the demand for skills in effective and accurate data analysis is also growing. This work aims to provide practical assistance for specialists and researchers from various fields in working with statistical data.
The main objectives of the study are as follows: to compare different methods of data collection; to explain the main statistical methods of data analysis; to demonstrate the role of modern software in statistical analysis; to provide examples of the practical application of these methods.
Literature Review
Methods of collecting and analyzing statistical data have been widely studied by many scholars. A number of scientific works have presented important theoretical and practical perspectives on statistical analysis methods and their significance in scientific research.
For example, Ronald Aylmer Fisher is one of the scholars who made a significant contribution to the development of statistical analysis theory. He developed the scientific foundations of experimental research and regression analysis. His work laid the groundwork for the widespread application of statistical methods in scientific research. Similarly, Karl Pearson developed the theory of correlation and statistical relationships, creating important methods for analyzing statistical data. His work plays a crucial role in statistical modeling and data analysis.
The work of John Tukey also holds an important place in the development of modern statistical analysis methods. He introduced important ideas regarding data visualization, exploratory data analysis, and the practical application of statistical methods. In addition, modern software tools are widely used today in the process of processing and analyzing statistical data. Statistical programs make it possible to analyze large volumes of data quickly and efficiently. The scientific views and studies mentioned above contribute to the further improvement of methods for collecting and analyzing statistical data.
Research Methodology In this study, the literature review method was chosen as the main methodology to examine the theoretical and practical aspects of collecting and analyzing statistical data. During the research process, leading scientific journals, books, conference materials, and online databases were used. Both classical and modern literature on data collection methods were analyzed in detail, including surveys, observations, experiments, and the use of databases. The specific advantages, disadvantages, scope of application, and effectiveness of each method were evaluated.
For example, surveys allow researchers to reach a wide audience; however, they may be affected by respondent subjectivity and sampling errors. Observations can provide objective data but often require considerable time and resources. Experiments are effective for identifying cause-and-effect relationships, although their implementation conditions may be complex. The opportunities of using digital data sources (big data) and the specific challenges associated with processing such data were also examined.
Regarding data analysis methods, both descriptive statistics (mean, median, mode, standard deviation, etc.) and inferential statistics (hypothesis testing, t-test, ANOVA, chi-square test, etc.) were analyzed. In addition, the main principles and applications of correlation and regression analysis methods were studied to determine relationships between variables. The importance of data preparation stages such as data integration, data cleaning, and data transformation was emphasized. Modern statistical software tools, including SPSS, R, Python (with libraries such as Pandas, NumPy, SciPy, and Scikit-learn), and Stata, were also reviewed in terms of their role and capabilities in statistical analysis.
These tools allow researchers to visualize data through methods such as histograms, charts, and scatter plots, making research results more understandable. The research process consisted of the following stages: Systematic review of scientific literature related to the topic. Classification and description of data collection and analysis methods. Identification of advantages, disadvantages, and application areas of each method. Evaluation of the role of modern software tools in statistical analysis. Generalization of research results and formulation of conclusions.
Analysis and Results
The literature analysis showed that numerous methods exist for collecting and analyzing statistical data, and their application depends on the research objectives, available resources, and the type of data. Among data collection methods, surveys are the most widely used. They are essential for studying public opinion, market research, and the analysis of social phenomena. For example, sampling methods such as simple random sampling and stratified sampling can provide samples that reliably represent the general population. However, surveys may face problems such as non-response and social desirability bias, which can affect the accuracy of results.
Observation methods, including participant observation and non-participant observation, are used to study various natural processes. For example, observations are valuable in studying animal behavior or analyzing children’s behavior in school environments. Experimental methods, involving control groups and experimental groups, are considered the most powerful approach for identifying cause-and-effect relationships. Experiments are widely used in medicine to test drug effectiveness and in psychology to study the effects of various factors on human behavior. Digital sources such as social networks, websites, and sensors generate large volumes of data (big data). Analyzing such data requires specialized technologies and algorithms.
In data analysis, descriptive statistics play a crucial role in summarizing results. For example, calculating the mean salary, determining the age distribution of respondents, or identifying the standard deviation of product sales helps in understanding research outcomes. Inferential statistics allow conclusions to be drawn about a population based on sample data. In hypothesis testing, the p-value plays an important role; if p < 0.05, the hypothesis is usually rejected.
The correlation coefficient, such as Pearson’s r, indicates the degree of linear relationship between two variables (r ranges from -1 to +1). Regression analysis enables modeling the effect of one or more independent variables on a dependent variable. For example, house prices can be predicted based on area, location, and age using linear regression: Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + … + εModern software tools such as R and Python significantly simplify data analysis. In R, the ggplot2 package allows high-quality visualizations, while Python with Pandas and Scikit-learn provides powerful capabilities for data processing and model development. The results of the study indicate that selecting appropriate methods, preparing data correctly, and interpreting results accurately are essential for effective statistical analysis.
Conclusion
This study provided a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical and practical aspects of collecting and analyzing statistical data. The findings indicate that effective data collection and analysis play a crucial role in scientific research and practical decision-making. Various methods of data collection exist, including surveys, observations, experiments, and digital sources, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate method depends on the research objectives and available conditions. In data analysis, methods such as descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, correlation analysis, and regression analysis play an important role. These methods are widely used for hypothesis testing, identifying relationships between variables, and developing predictive models.
Modern software tools such as R and Python significantly simplify the data analysis process and expand visualization capabilities. However, the correct selection of methods, proper data preparation, and critical interpretation of results largely depend on the researcher’s knowledge and skills. The methods and principles presented in this article can serve as a practical guide for specialists, researchers, and students working with statistical data. In the future, with the growth of data volumes and the emergence of new technologies, it will become increasingly important to study and apply more complex and automated data analysis methods. In particular, further research is needed on the role of machine learning in statistical analysis, new algorithms for processing big data, and methods for ensuring data privacy.
Additionally, conducting more case studies demonstrating the practical application of these methods in various fields would be beneficial.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar roʻyxati 1. Abramov, A. V. (2019). Osnovy statistiki. Moskva: Prospekt.2. Agresti, A., & Franklin, C. L. (2013). Statistics: The Art and Science of Learning from Data. Pearson.3. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.4. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.5. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.6. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.7. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R. Springer.8. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied Linear Statistical Models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.9. Liao, T. F. (2013). Data collection processes in social science research. SAGE Publications.10. McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2017). Statistics. Pearson.
11. Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2012). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.12. Nisbet, R. C. (2003). The social psychology of extraordinary claims of the paranormal: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–369.13. Peat, J., & Bartram, L. (2008). Medical Statistics: A Guide to the Interpretation of Medical Literature. BMJ Books.14. Shumway, R. H., & Stoffer, D. S. (2017). Time Series Analysis and Its Applications: With R Examples. Springer.15. Tan, H. W., & Tan, S. H. (2019). A Comprehensive Guide to Data Collection Methods. CRC Press.16. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley.17. Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer.18. Yiu, K. M. (2010). The Art of R Programming: Design, Build, Extend. Addison-Wesley.19. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall.
This short story recalls a childhood memory connected with the tradition of singing Ramadan songs in Uzbek neighborhoods. Through the innocent perspective of a child, the narrative reflects on warmth, kindness, and the first experience of injustice. The story highlights family affection, particularly a touching moment that reveals a father’s quiet love and care for his child. It also captures the cultural atmosphere of Ramadan and the emotional memories associated with it.
Keywords Ramadan tradition, childhood memory, fatherly love, family values, Uzbek culture, neighborhood traditions
Story
I was still a small child then. It was one of those years when the month of Ramadan fell in the middle of winter. The days were short, the nights were long, and the air was cold and biting. One evening, together with the children from our neighborhood, we set out to sing Ramadan songs from house to house. The older boys came with us as guards. They never sang themselves—perhaps they were too shy. The younger children, however, would step up to the gates and sing loudly: We came to your door singing for Ramadan, May God bless your cradle with a baby boy. Ash in the hearth, money in the pocket, Please bring out a hundred soʻm for us. With that hundred soʻm we bought a horse, We sold the horse and married a girl. The girl’s name was Nigora, Poor thing, she bakes bread. Nigora ran away, And the dough was left to rise. What shall we do now? We will keep wandering, singing Ramadan!
The homeowners would come out with bread, sweets, fruit, or sometimes a little money. Four of us would hold a cloth open like a tablecloth, and the gifts would be placed into it. In this way we walked through several neighborhoods, happily singing and laughing. But when it was time to divide what we had collected, the older boys took the money and the best things for themselves. The rest—the leftovers—were given to us. Looking back now, I realize that this was probably the first injustice my young heart had ever witnessed.
When I returned home, my hands had turned blue from the cold. In my hands I carried a small bundle: dark bread, some fruit, and a few small treats. My mother looked at me with worry, pulled me into her arms, and said, “Oh, my poor child, why did you need this? Look how cold you are.” I kept telling her about the unfairness I had seen. No matter how hard she tried, I couldn’t warm up. My hands were stiff like wood, and tears slipped from my eyes.
Then my father took my little hands into his large, warm ones. Gently, he blew warm air onto them again and again, trying to warm them. Slowly, the warmth returned. That day, I discovered something new about my father. Until then, I had always thought of him as a strict and stern man. But in that quiet moment, I realized how deeply kind and loving he truly was. Every time the month of Ramadan comes, and children walk through the streets singing Ramadan songs, this memory returns to me.
Ramadan, thank you for revealing to me a father’s love.
Author Bio
Sardorjon Nabiyev is an emerging writer from Uzbekistan whose works focus on childhood memories, cultural traditions, and family values. His writing reflects everyday life and emotional experiences through simple yet meaningful storytelling.
