It's All My Fault It's all my fault. I signed up. They had me type. Left, right, hault. Sit, copy - bored. Ordered "Drop your pants" in the Orderly Room 'cause my unlaundered uniform smelled ripe, I gave in, my confidence shook - until now, just look: office factotums of keyboard everywhere - screens and computers tied on. Seeing it happen I've been so floored: my inaction caused all of this gloom in wage-slaves to the one percent... Oh my poor colleagues on whom I should fawn, my collusion was without intent. It's all my fault, I saw it coming, What the media's trying to do to us besides entertain and inform - unbecoming to show graphic scenes they make such a fuss of psychic or physical sexual mayhem or torture delivered in cinema - then, on T.V., bought-up home-videos of groin accidents to them is fare that is favored by us citizenry - with a musical track. To those screens'd desensitize or power'd divide, I admit I'm the one who kept silently watching - so must apologize. With positive passions more our kind of fun I thought I was gracious in showing some ruth - but I had forgotten that beauty is truth. I must claim the fault, suspected we're fated - the lies were there - should have extrapolated. The equal chance at happiness we're told we get when behind the ears we're still quite wet becomes the need to toil for subsistence wage.... The nice policeman they say kids should trust gives karate-chop pat-downs, backroom outrage - not protection or service but a torture bust. As in families infant sibling empathy, in society populist sympathy - and later those arrested in the protests we see - are put up against the wall by our powers that be.... I'm the one who didn't hold free love together in a world of possessiveness and jealousy - though my buddy and I couldn't be sure whether our girls, having ravished us thoroughly, couldn't just up and do the same for another; and, when we asked 'em, heard 'em agree that my buddy and I could be those other! Ah, we four had commitment and variety 'til the draft wrote my friend, and he grew quite thin. So, since one of our girls had an aunt who could cover their expenses 'til his 4-F deferment came in, they left. Four people, each with just one lover - living as couples in estrangement's sin. When school, which canceled band and art long since, to stop phys-ed, but double lunch-hour, tries, and overeating children make parents wince.... Blame me! To sedentary stresses wise, I couldn't my co-desk-workers convince the balm for our discomfort is Exercise. T'was sitting, class and office, sixteen hours a day inspired my half-hour morning jogs, not my own insight's energizing powers.... Workouts are epicures in stoic togs - arduous aerobics are invigorating fun to free sprites from weariness that mind had begun - I couldn't make it obvious to everyone. .............................. Leadership "The marionetteers of capital who pull our strings behind the scenes to drain our strength can't sap it all," said the puppet with the shears in his jeans." ..................... Inspiration When wine country tried my sanity like a nestless bird with a clear-cut tree I came to the city for humanity and a new inspiration for poetry. The inbound bus was my ship of fools. Out its window I tossed my last pack of Kools: I vowed I'd make, 'til the day I die, the breath of life my only high - which now was augmented, to my cost, by the unavoidability of car exhaust. ... Reconsider With adolescent dreams we bury so much of human nature too when youthful premonitions scary bring mundane fortune into view. Though by the water's edge lay a myriad of sphere-cut gem-pebbles in thier Milky Way arc of the bay - a particolor night's suns' trebles - And each colored flare in its bowl throbs with the starlight of sol. ...
Category Archives: CHAOS
Christopher Bernard reviews San Francisco Ballet’s new premiere: Mere Mortals

“Mere Mortals”: Davide Occhipinti, of San Francisco Ballet. From Hamill Industries; source photo: Lindsey Rallo
The Ballet of Terror
Mere Mortals
San Francisco Ballet
War Memorial Opera House
Reviewed by Christopher Bernard
Early on the gloomy day of the performance I attended, I noted it would be an unusually short evening – a mere hour and fifteen minutes, without even an intermission. And I grumbled to myself about short shrift and lean pickings.
But the city has been pasted for weeks with black-and-white photos, scored with the vaguely ominous title and its allusion to ancient gods and goddesses, of a bare-breasted dancer ensnarled in a swirl of white sheet, like a larva breaking from a chrysalis or an angel caught in a damage of wings, flogging the new work – and so my curiosity was keen.
And, as it turned out, with more justification than I could possibly have known.
“Mere Mortals,” the first dance commissioned under San Francisco Ballet’s new artistic director Tamara Rojo (the War Memorial Opera House was illuminated in red in her honor), was introduced to the world on that chilly January evening just before a weeklong train of atmospheric rivers threatened to pummel the Bay Area with reminders of nature’s (or the gods’) ultimate sovereignty.
As it happened, we didn’t have to wait for her salutary raging: the first tempest was brewed, quite satisfactorily, thank you very much, by her most gifted, and most rebellious, child inside the compact, baroque precincts of the War Memorial Opera House.
If you didn’t read the program, you might never have guessed that this dance, which seemed entirely abstract yet was radiant with an urgent and perfectly clear meaning, was in fact about the early Titans of Greek mythology, or Pandora and her cursed jar. Or that the dance drew parallels between the fraught liberation of human power found in those ancient stories, and today’s invention, by “mere mortals,” of something that may render obsolescent even our own highest gifts – namely, artificial intelligence.
But no matter: it was clear within minutes that we were witnessing an allegory about the entwining of liberation and evil at the heart of the human experiment, and the two-sided blade that is hope itself. And it was also perfectly clear that we were in the firm and steady hands of masters of dance, music, and stagecraft; at least one spectator was left in a trance of admiration at what these “mere mortals” were able to magick in a mere hour and a quarter.
The dance unfolds in half a dozen acts, at a rough count, each broken into short scenes, most of them led by Pandora (danced with a darkly inflected, impeccable grace by Jennifer Stahl), the infinitely curious woman who unleashed woe upon the world while also freeing a Hope that encompasses a touch of that creativity of the gods that menaces as much as it promises.
Pandora danced, solo, in a long opening scene until, at its apparently tranquil conclusion, she opened her infamous jar, out of which irrupted a plague of dancers, the Evils she has freed, swarming like an ink of insects onto a stage whose primary colors throughout the evening were the starkest of whites and blacks.
From then on, the dance is an intricate play of the dialectic of ferocious good and implacable evil whose paradoxical result is an endless invention: the evils themselves are provokers of beauty, and Hope itself is serpent-like, ophidian, menacing – freeing.
The Titans – a dark Prometheus (Isaac Hernández), bringer of fire and liberator of the most gifted of species (the program will inform you this character combines the rebellious Titan with his arch nemesis, Zeus, king of the gods and ruler of the world), and, later, his boyishly joyful brother Epimetheus (Parker Garrison) – compete to dominate the story, but fail to in the end: at the brilliant heart of the piece, Pandora and Epimetheus perform a remarkable pas de deux that actually embodies the romantic drama many fail to capture: most pas de deux are signs of romance but rarely persuade that the couple onstage actually is in love: this one did, profoundly, alchemically.
In the final act, Pandora is resorbed into the cosmos after a lengthy “2001”-inspired odyssey into a chaos of futurity, and the evils (or are they angels now?), dancing like ghosts glittering in silver, ring like an ouroboros and seethe like a horde of bullies and mean girls around the golden boy Hope (Wei Wang), who seems, briefly, triumphant over the chaos.
But even he, with his suspect minions, is finally sucked back into a darkness that remains, beyond either divinity or humanity, absolutely sovereign yet infinitely creative.
The choreographer of this dazzling evening was the Canadian Aszure Barton, who seems to have taken up the ink-black mantle of William Forsythe. In fact, this was one of the most powerful new dances I have been privileged to see since Forsythe’s “New Sleep,” premiered by the Ballet in the 1980s.
The brilliantly original score, by turns driving and lyrical – part electronic, part orchestral, with solos by violinist Cordula Merks, timpanist Zubin Hathi, and harpist Annabell Taubl – is by Floating Points (known, more pedestrianly, as Sam Shepherd). Conductor Martin West led with thrust and panache. Equal on the bill is a breathtaking production design and visuals by Hamill Industries: Pablo Barquin and Anna Diaz, who helped shape the evening into a complex and satisfying whole. If I have any complaint, it is that the soloists were not identified in the printed program notes or the usual printed fill-in (the tyranny of the cell phone continues apace: a scrambled QR code will sesame you to the neglected information).
The gods of the Ballet were even more generous than giving us a mere work of genius: to make up for a “short” evening, they added an hour-long disco party in the lobby after the performance, with DJ, light-bearing dancers, and cash bars, that was attended by a few hundred dazed-looking audience members, some of whom let down their hair and joined in the dancing. In my mind I called it “The Party at the End of the World.”
I still felt in a bit of a trance when I got home, and posted the following on Facebook:
“I sit here at the computer, feeling relatively speechless, battered by an evening at the ballet. . . .
The words come with even greater slowness than usual, as if from a pit black as pitch, with a silence that . . .
. . . mere mortals break at their peril.
Dance needs to be cautious about evoking such gods.
Pandora danced open a treasure of evils.
Leaving, at the bottom, Hope.
Savage. Demonic. A kind of catastrophe.
If a magnificent one.“
I was left, at the end of the night, with a final question: who, after all, is Pandora?
Friend reader: is it us?
Is it you?
_____
Christopher Bernard is an award-winning poet, novelist, playwright, and essayist. His most recent books are the children’s books If You Ride A Crooked Trolley . . . and The Judgment of Biestia, the first two stories in the series “Otherwise.”
Story from Alma Ryan
Colored Catastrophe The world was colors. The streets were made of buttons and a fabric sky was raining droplets of paint that splatter on the world. My cheeks turn to a river of yellows and pinks and blues. They swirl down my arms and into my boots, landing with little plinks as they fall from my fingertips. Sequins stick to my eyes and I assume it’s gotten cold enough to snow. Paint dries on my skin and sticks me in place, staring at the sky. Arms outstretched, eyes wide, mouth wide. Pom pom’s land on my tongue and dissolves like cotton candy. Dripping sweet, bitter, sour, cold, boiling. Streaming through my body till I break out of my cast. Running, walking, skipping, bouncing upon textiles. A person stands on the corner, stick still. I wave and get nothing back. My feet slow and I circle them only to find the person is entirely flat. On an impulse I poke them and they crumple, colors mixing into brown water and swirling down a nearby drain I hadn't noticed before. I freeze before I dismiss the odd moment and keep waking, a strained smile on my face. I walk and walk for what seems like hours and probably is because when I finally reach the once distant city, the fabrics have gone black. Entirely, there’s not a single star. Something moves in my peripheral and I spin fast only to see brown water trickling down the slope of the street. Another movement and I catch the last of a paper person sloshing to the ground with a squelch. I stare for a long moment, watching the water swirl down the street. Before walking away hesitantly, heading further into the city. The sidewalks are empty as I wander, though occasionally water flips over my boots. I get so lost in thought that I don't notice when I enter a paper filled clearing until a frail hand taps my shoulder. I turn and the person looks me right in the eye for a long moment before promptly splashing downwards onto the pavement. Its friends follow suit and the square floods. It picks me up and takes me winding back through the city, back through the wilderness, all the way back to where a cast made of paint lays limp on the ground. A portal similar to the one I arrived through waits there. It’s gray now. Gray like the world I live in. It was colorful before, inciting, inviting. This world is odd and the paper people are dying but it’s beautiful and marvelous. I’m not so sure I want to go back. The water pushes and I stumble into the gray. The blinding light vanishes quickly and I'm standing in my living room, alone. I move my hand to wipe my eyes only to realize, I'm a paper person and my feet are wet.
Essay from Biloldin Mahmudov
THE BASIC RULES OF DIPLOMATIC ETIQUETTE
Teacher, Andijan State Institute of Foreign Language
Biloldin Mahmudov
Student, Andijan State Institute of Foreign Language
Abstract: Diplomacy is the art of conducting communication and negotiations between nations or groups of individuals with different interests, cultural backgrounds, and objectives. Diplomatic etiquette refers to the established norms of behavior and protocol that govern the interactions between diplomats and officials from different countries. The rules of diplomatic etiquette help to prevent misunderstandings and foster goodwill among nations. In this article, we shall discuss basic rules of diplomatic etiquette which are essential to follow.
Key words: Diplomat, Protocol, Language and cultural sensitivity, Confidentiality and discretion, Respect for diplomatic immunity
1. Respect for the host country: Diplomats should always show respect for the host country's laws, customs, and traditions, and should never engage in behavior that could be construed as disrespectful. They should also be mindful of their personal appearance, dress appropriately, and adopt a courteous and respectful demeanor when interacting with local officials and citizens.
2. Protocol for official visits: When a diplomat visits another country, they should follow proper protocol with regards to their formal attire, the order of their arrival and departure, and their seating arrangement at official events. They should also adhere to the established protocol when addressing hosts and guests, and observe any cultural or religious protocols that apply in the host country.
3. Language and cultural sensitivity: Diplomats should demonstrate language and cultural sensitivity when communicating with officials and citizens of the host country. They should learn the language and customs of the host country to the extent possible, and make an effort to communicate in the local language when appropriate. They should also avoid any comments or actions that could be considered insensitive or offensive.
4. Confidentiality and discretion: Diplomats should maintain strict confidentiality and discretion about any sensitive information that they acquire in the course of their duties. They should also avoid any public display of their personal opinions or political affiliations that could be perceived as an endorsement by their home country.
5. Respect for diplomatic immunity: Diplomats enjoy diplomatic immunity, which grants them exemption from the laws of the host country. They should, however, conduct themselves impeccably in the host country and never abuse their immunity status. They should also respect the laws and regulations of the host country and avoid engaging in any illegal activities, as this could compromise their diplomatic status.
The training of diplomats and the use of diplomatic language and protocol are specialist, but vital skills. Why? Because diplomats are representatives of their countries around the world and are the keys to successful negotiation of agreements and defusing political tensions at the highest levels. As Rosalie Rivett, author, teacher and Chief Executive of the Women in Diplomacy organization in London says, Protocol is the etiquette of diplomacy. It does so by following certain rules of behaviour. Protocol indicates an acceptable standard in diplomatic discourse, dialogue and negotiation.’
Language and the way it is used in diplomatic documents is an essential part of protocol. As Rivett explains in the introduction, diplomacy is ‘a highly nuanced role played out in language – the diplomatic lexicon – which is carefully chosen and in a manner which enhances the standing of their countries among host nations’. Language, therefore, is crucial to diplomatic success and the word protocol itself is derived from ancient Greek protokollon meaning ‘first glue’. Diplomatic Protocol is a manual aimed at young diplomats in training and in simple language explains how protocol works. The 13 chapters, each with abullet point summary of key points at the end, examine the roles of diplomats in overseas missions. A considerable advantage of the book is that it contains many examples, some even as recent as 2017. For students of diplomatic language and culture the key chapters are those on Modern Diplomacy, Internet Diplomacy and Media Communications, and Crisis Management.
The author makes the key point that the information age and the use of ICT (Information and Communications Technology) have increasingly robbed diplomats of a key asset in communicating information, that of time. Rivett explains: The world has become so small, thanks to instant communications and even faster forms of travel, that an event on one side of the world can spark an immediate reaction on the other, and all of it instantly recorded and shared online. There is no longer time to pause and ponder while a letter or telegram wends its way from an embassy to the home nation.
Reaction has to be almost instantaneous, appropriate and at the very least designed not to exacerbate what might be an already volatile situation. It has to be diplomatic and governed by established protocol – the rules of diplomatic exchange and last but not least, it has to be media friendly.’ As Michael Cole, PR advisor and former BBC Royal Correspondent notes in the book, how a diplomat reacts to a crisis is key to how it will be reported and as a result how the diplomat, the mission and the country he/she represents will be perceived.
The important thing is to take control of the crisis, talk to the relevant people, be available for interviews and answering questions, keeping it simple (avoid jargon), listen, apologise if you get things wrong (everyone makes mistakes), if you can’t answer, explain why (legal constraints, family, etc.) and above all, advises Cole, never say ‘No comment’. In an interesting and rather amusing illustration of how media can influence diplomatic etiquette, Rivett describes how the body language of the diplomatic handshake for the TV cameras can itself be a power play: ‘You may notice some people jockeying for position prior to a photograph being taken of them shaking hands; this is because they know that the person whose hand is closer to the camera and thus more visible will be perceived as dominant over the one whose hand is concealed.
Rivett points out that diplomatic language is a formal and specific use of language. It is not the same as polite business language. Even in our modern world the very language of diplomacy is more formalised than general conversation or written exchanges. Even in protests or criticism of another state’s attitudes or actions, she explains that however harsh or critical the message, ‘it is traditionally understood that the ambassador is merely conveying the wishes, comments, even criticisms of his/her home state ... whatever language or tone is used, the aim is always to keep the channels of communication open.’
This is why it is important to maintain the protocol of third person singular or plural in Notes or Notes Verbales, as they are called in the UN, and use standard phrases, such as ‘has the honour to’, ‘avails himself/herself of the opportunity to’ and ‘expresses concern regarding’.
Letters between Heads of State may be more personal, using ‘I’ and ‘we’, but will still be more formal in general style. The increasingly informal style of business correspondence is not the trend in diplomatic correspondence. ‘Dear Ambassador Smith or Dear Bill are not acceptable as diplomatic greetings, although you can get away with the equivalents in business correspondence where formality in some environments may be seen as a disadvantage.’
There is greater convergence between business and diplomacy in the area of recognising and adapting to cultural sensitivities. In November 2010, British Prime Minister, David Cameron, turned up for an official visit to China wearing a red poppy to commemorate Remembrance Day which honours military personnel who died in World Wars I and II. The Chinese objected. For them the red poppy was a reminder of the opium wars of the late 19th century. The Chinese asked David Cameron to remove the poppy. Cameron’s advisers refused. Note to protocol officer, ‘Don’t send senior British politicians to China during Remembrance Week’.
On a visit to the G20 meeting in Hanzhou in China in 2016, President Obama had no red carpet laid out for him when he arrived whereas all other Heads of State did. Was this a snub by the Chinese or simply due to the fact that President Obama descended the steps of the presidential plane directly and didn’t wait for the red carpeted steps provided by the Chinese authorities?
Rivett notes that etiquette sets the tone for all linguistic and cultural negotiations. What is said and done and what is unsaid are equally important, and the use of constructive ambiguity is an important linguistic and cultural skill in diplomatic communication. English, Rivett believes, is full of ambiguity, an average of six synonyms for every word. In Arabic, family terms are very important. English has only one word for ‘cousin’, but Arabic has eight words to denote first cousins and sixteen for second cousins, distinguishing who is being referred to and the degree of kinship.
The last 20 years have seen major changes in how we communicate through the emergence of the Internet and social media. Does this mean that language and cultural protocol in the Diplomatic Service and international organisations like the UN are out of date? Part of the diplomat’s job, says Rivett, is to ‘evaluate and interpret information and advise the home nation on what is important and what is mere rumour and speculation’. The Internet and social media have dramatically increased the amount of information to be processed. In addition, cyberpolitik and cyber warfare has added a new dimension to political and diplomatic security and mediapolitik is the new reality.
In conclusion, diplomatic etiquette is an essential aspect of diplomatic conduct that helps to facilitate communication and cooperation between nations. Diplomats should be mindful of the established rules of etiquette and conduct themselves in a manner that respects the host country's culture, customs, and laws. By following the rules of diplomatic etiquette, diplomats can foster goodwill among nations and build tr ust and cooperation in the international community.
REFERENCES.
1. Kukushin V.S. Theory and teaching - Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix Publishing House, 2005. - 474 p. 2. Sidenko A.S. Method of projects: history and practice of application // Head teacher. - 2003. - No. 6. - P. 15 - 23. 3. Chechel I.V. Method of projects: subjective and objective assessment of results // Principals of the school. - 1998. 4. - S. 7 - 12.4. Sergeev, I.S. How to organize the project activities of students: A practical guide for employees of educational institutions / I.S. Sergeev. – M.: ARKTI, 2003. –80 p. 5. Polat E.S. New pedagogical and information technologies in the education system: Textbook for students of pedagogical universities / - Moscow: Publishing Center "Academy", 1999. - 211 p . 6. Миркасымов С.М., Рахимова М.А. Дипломатическая служба: теория И практика. Учеб. Пос. -Т., 2004. 7. Yuldasheva G. Diplomatik va konsullik huquqi. O’quv qo’llanma – Т.:4’ TDYul, 2009 y. 8.Абдуллаева Л.М. Особенности дипломатического протокола:
Essay from Odina Rustamjonova
Using public transport
Nowadays, it is becoming more and more common for people to use public transport in their daily life. Many people prefer to arrive at their destination with public transport like buses, trains, or others. However, what are the benefits of using these transports, and what are the drawbacks? In this essay, I will discuss some of the reasons why public transportation is becoming popular and try to draw some conclusions.
Let`s begin by looking at the advantages of using public transport. One of the positive sides of using them is that they are cheaper than private cars. What I mean by this is that it is more convenient for students or people who do not have money to buy their own car or use taxis. Secondly, using different kinds of public transport is more environmentally friendly. These days, you can see most people have their own vehicles, and these transports give unnecessary gases into the air. It is harmful for the earth and for our life. We should protect our planet. In addition, if we use public transport, there will be fewer traffic jams in the city. That means there will be fewer private cars or vehicles.
Another issue is that it can be unconvenient for people who need to change buses or trains to arrive at their destination. Turning to the other side of the argument, there are many people in them. Sometimes, passengers need to wait for a long time to go somewhere. However, some public transport is very dirty, even seats, and you do not want to use them.
In conclusion, there are clearly both positives and negatives to public transportation. While using them, we can protect our nature, the Earth, because if there are not many cars, there will be less air pollution. Personally, I believe the benefits of using public transportation will eventually outweigh any negatives.
Writer: Odina Rustamjonova, student of Ishakhan Ibrat Creativity School.
Book excerpt from Chimezie Ihekuna (Mr. Ben)’s new book Talking Thoughts

I was lost in the box called life. In it, (I) I wanted learning but my education was deafening I wanted truth but my reality faked its root I wanted to buy the right counsel but my mind controller got me its left sell I wanted to be free but my pursuit turned a tree I wanted information but my vision brought me deformation I wanted wellness but my state showed illness I wanted a wife but my life mirrored a knife I wanted a companion but my plight was in oblivion I wanted the clarity of pleasure but my naked eyes saw the dullness of pressure I wanted to live forever but my death was to question For-Ever I wanted peace but my perception reflected unease (II) I wanted to know more about people but my understanding was a fumble I wanted to be everyone’s friend but my experience was the Pal’s end I wanted to be rich but my efforts didn’t catch a fish! I wanted direction but my limitation was the obstruction 3 I wanted to know the ‘why’ to everything happening but my answer had to cry to all prevailing I wanted to invest in good but my previous return showed ‘fooled!’ I wanted to scream because of pains but my calmness showed up because of gains (III) I wanted people to hear my voice but my quest was a noise I wanted money but my struggle was funny I wanted to know why the world is divided but the response was: ‘it’s control is what is favourited’ I wanted to know what happens after death but my physical life told me I was on earth I wanted to tell people my experience but my words failed me in their presence I wanted to know if I knew what I know my existence replied me with a ‘NO!’ I wanted to find myself through my works but my inner-self whispered: ‘If you want to find yourself, then think OUT OF THE BOX!
Chimezie Ihekuna (Mr. Ben)’s entire book is available here for order.
Poetry from Jerry Langdon

Homes, I Love You
I don’t really know how you see me,
What you think of me, If you even know me.
I just know I never stopped trying
And sometimes I was hiding; crying;
Trying to be a man like I should
Doing everything I could
And sometimes I went to far
Reaching to be a star
For you.
That’s what I do.
That’s all I know.
Always holding on not letting go.
I know I should have been better.
I know it sounds, and it is……bitter
That’s just who I am
Trying to be a better man.
I know I could be a jerk.
I know I was all about work.
As closed as fort knox.
Sometimes you had to get past road blocks
Just to get time from me
But believe me I’m sorry.
I know I used to drink
Sometimes I just didn’t want to think.
I don’t really know how you see me,
What you think of me, If you even know me.
I have always been a wound in duct tape
Hoping that the blood can’t escape.
Hiding my tears so you couldn’t see.
Not wanting you to think down on me.
‘Cause I’m not a hero.
I’m still hoping to grow.
I always tried to be the glue
But somehow I threw a shoe.
You might find me a disgrace
But my heart was always in the right place.
Just not always at the right time.
Believe me I find that a crime.
Damn I hope I did something right
Even when I was often out of sight.
It was never easy
Trying not to be me
And give you everything you would need.
This is making my heart bleed.
Homes, I love you more than you know
And that continues to grow.
Heaven’s Forked Child
When I see lightning
I count til the thunder
When the skies are fighting
Just before the world goes under
I scream, waiting on a wonder.
Knowing that will never come.
But for the moment I’m numb.
Angel fire cracks
Ripping the sky
Pitchfork leaving tracks
Freight train rolling by
I cry out, beckoning the sky.
Vengeance on a raging railway
Won’t the rain come out to play?
The Storm is Heaven’s child
The rain is Mother’s tears.
And when everything goes wild
And the lightning appears
The thunder cries of fears.
When it thinks it has me in my place
I just laugh in its face.
Down Town
He’s got the keys
Gonna take the town on a cruise.
Force them to their knees.
Show them there was no excuse
To be beaten and run out of town.
The moon bleeds for him
He won’t be taken down.
The wind howls, “Never again!”
The engine roars,
The wheels burn.
Lock all your doors.
Now it is his turn.
Take this town to Hell.
Ring the Liberty Bell.
And in a flash
The town was ash.
From south-western Michigan, Jerry Langdon lives in Germany since the early 90’s. He is an Artist and Poet. His works bathe in a darker side of emotion and fantasy. He has released five books of Poetry titled “Temperate Darkness an Behind the Twilight Veil”, “Death and other cold things” “Rollercoaster Heart” and “Frosted Dreams” Jerry is also the editor and publisher of the literary magazine Raven Cage Zine poetry and prose. His poetic inspirations are derived from poets such as Edgar Allen Poe, Robert Frost and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. As well as from various Rock Bands. His apparently twisted mind, twists and intertwines fantasy with reality.